He is mad because his "science based" training methods don't work, does he even lift? Never seen any actual fitness content from Shredded Sports Söyence
Bald dyel incel
He obtained a useless degree and wasn't able to get a job so he went on youtube and targeted the lowest common denominator "fitness" influencers by providing exercise science 101 knowledge that you could obtain from Wikipedia and supplying studies that would not be able to replicate. "Evidence-based science" is his whole schtick, despite not working in a lab in his entire
there's literally no difference between basedence and gym bro methods. maybe you would get bit better results from training muscles 2x instead of 1x per week, but that's about it. everything else depends on genetics
>"science based" training methods don't work,
nice cherrypicking gay. there's that russian garden gnome manlet that's even bigger autists about science based training, and he's pretty fucking big. Science based training is 100% better than just doing random shit some 80iq gymcell made up while jacking off his pp
I hate "science based" fitness because the scope of fitness related studies are so small the results might as well mean nothing
>Oh look we trains 20 guys for 3 months this way
i agree in principle, but still it's better than random shit some guy in the gym made up.
Usually I'd consider advice from guys that have been lifting for years and got the results to be more valuable
why? if bum told you not to spend all your money on hookers and blow, would you consider it bad finance advice?
Midwit gay, "random shit some guy in the gym did it" is literally how bodybuilders figured stuff out fucking decades ago. Do you think Arnold was reading fucking science papers, and receiving newsletters from Jeff Nippard? And garden gnome Palestine isn't doping anything different from what Grug brained gym bros were doing 50 years ago, because they saw a buddy do it at some muscle beach.
i hate internet fitness basedience. the most cringeworthy retarded pointless grift of them all
>i need muh science papers and step by step instruction manual to lift muh weights
It’s worse than fucking useless when you look at the track record. Don’t bench below parallel, don’t squat below parallel, even retarded shit like arm accessories aren’t necessary. It’s fucking nonsense and goes in the face of what actually has worked for decades. Not ONE top bodybuilder has EVER followed this bullshit.
Actually it’s unironically not. If you see a huge guy with good or even decent form you are unironically 1000000000000000000x better off following his advice than scientific research on training
>that russian garden gnome manlet that's even bigger autists about science based training
Mike Israetel? I actually learned a lot from that schmarmy yid, he puts out good content.
>He is mad because his "science based" training methods don't work
This. Every single gay who pushes the science aspect is always insanely dyel. It's not a coincidence.
I don't understand how anyone can listen to him. He does the zoomer 'cut every sentence together so there's no 'downtime' between sentences, keeping the brain stimulated to the extreme. Also dude doesn't change his tone of voice once during his videos.
Shits out videos because it's his job
>dude doesn't change his tone of voice
He is reddit incarnate, passive-aggressive while never showing the results of his "science based" approach on his own body.
>never showing the results of his "science based" approach on his own body
maybe he just has very shit genetics?
OH NO NO NO NO NO
>This is the guy calling you a fake natty.
Science-bros..... I don't feel so good
Holy fuck I don't know what's better, his shit dl or that gay in the back cheating reps for days on his curls.
>this guy is a fake natty selling bad supplements
There I resumed all of his videos
Trying to gain traction as a content creator in a sphere where the average IQ hovers around room temperature, comprehension ability is non existent and the value in everything you say depends entirely on your physique, meanwhile trying to use science, evidence-based info, but not too much so that your content could interest that fringe, smarter group of lifters that actually have to patience to listen to longer videos analysing multiple papers, but too much so that the average zoomer loses interest after 1 minute. Also, bashing fitness influencers is a pretty low hanging fruit, not impressive content.
It just really rubs me the wrong way when people get pseudointellectual about watching videos. If you were that smart you would read the papers yourself not get some DYEL to predigest them and give you the spark notes invariably influenced by his personal biases.
theres a few channels that's alright, but generally I agree with you
no, I dont have the time to read all that shit myself, knowing that the information that's in them is shit at best and inaccurate at worst.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save name for the next time I post.