>Vice
I heard buzzfeed has lost a ton of revenue, can't be any different than this shit
This shit seems trivial in a vacuum but when you zoom out and view it holistically, we have a serious communist problem.
Media has two purposes.
>1) To manufacture consensus >2) To engage
This piece is of the latter. They don't believe a fucking word they're saying, they just want you to click the link. Oh the headline made you angry? Better click the link and see just how SILLY these journalists are!
Wise
Lets change all sports to weight classes only .... we will see who is better at sports pretty quick
>sha la la la la la you’re a fag >you’re just a man in drag >you’ll never be a girl (no no) >sha la la la la la >why oh why >your chromosomes don’t lie >you’ll never be a girl
>1) To manufacture consensus >2) To engage
This piece is of the latter. They don't believe a fucking word they're saying, they just want you to click the link. Oh the headline made you angry? Better click the link and see just how SILLY these journalists are!
Ooofff. Yeah that def shows a huge difference. Womens best in the world vs high school boys. It gets even crazier when you compare mens olympic records to women.
Anyhoo, I wish I was a teenage thot. I have severe pussy envy and women jealousy. At least I was born a good looking guy. I couldn’t imagine being horrid looking and having vagina envy, that would be torture. At least I can still fuck women.
Makes sense. I know I am not trans as I am very masculine and will not transition. I’d make a horrid woman as I am a mesomorph, 5’10” @ 184, square cut jaw.
But yeah, wish I could wear cute little dresses and skirts outside the bedroom. Pussy envy is crazy, lol.
Reminder karsten braasch (rank 203) beat both williams sister back to back while intentionally playing badly and have spent the morning drinking and playing golf.
Tennis isn't even a sport where men have a big physical advantage since it's mostly about technique/strategy and a little bit of cardio. Could you imagine the 203-ranked male wrestler against a female world champion? Or a semipro men's rugby team playing a match against the best women's rugby team in the world? Even having that matchup would be dangerous for the women.
What football? There is professional women's rugby and soccer. It's just no one cares about either.
1 year ago
Anonymous
No I mean American Football. As far as I'm aware there is no real women's team at all.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Oh dunno shit about handegg aside fr the fact that they're only on the field for 3 mins before they swap teams for some reason. Seems retarded
1 year ago
Anonymous
Is football the only sport where there is no professional women's league?
Most motorsports are gender neutral and typically end up male dominated.
Certain gymnastics divisions are male / female only. For example women don't do the rings nor the parallel bars, while men don't do the bouncy floor thing or the uneven bars.
There is no professional women's sumo wrestling division.
I'm sure there are some other niche sports out there.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Men do do "the bouncy floor thing". It's called floor. The alternate apparatus for women are just cope because they're incapable of being competitive on those apparatus.
Motocross is super upper body intensive too. I would say the same is true of F1 in terms of withstanding g force in turns. Also women can't drive so
1 year ago
Anonymous
Oh damn I didn't realize men did the floor competition. Thanks for fixing that.
And yeah all racing is brutal on the body, with F1 in particular for exceeding lateral forces of 3Gs at the high speed circuits.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>professional women's sumo wrestling division.
Imagine the smell
Fastest officially recogised serve for men is 157.2mph (263kmh)
Fastest officially recognised serve for women is 136.7mph (220kmh)
A 20mph difference is pretty fucking significant. To put it in perspective that's roughly the difference between a school zone and freeway speed limit here.
So there is one event where olympic women can beat high school boys. This tracks with what I've heard about extreme endurance events, that women can actually compete with men, i.e. that when you remove strength, speed, and agility from the equation and get down to pure endurance they have a chance.
To view an outlier as representative of a group as a whole is just one of the many ways they are destroying science. The vice article even proposes a "new scientific model" - fucking huh?
Looking at averages instead of one outlier (who is probably built like a man anyway), you get a much better picture that women are, in fact, the weaker sex.
lmao when I first started going to the gym I was going with these two really strong lads who would do a lot of heavy sets on OHP. The first time, I started with 0.25plate on each side but once we were a few sets in and I was straining to do the empty bar. They took their weight off when it was my turn and just put the clips on lol. >tfw when you can't finish your last set of >lmao1clip
>Read
No. Men are stronger way before advanced lifter level. Even at novice they dominate every weight class.
I've seen a 40kg midget squat 2.5pl8 for reps.
No to quote: > Women are biologically better survivors from the moment they're born. They have stronger immune systems and are protected from certain genetic conditions that affect only men, explaining partly why women live so much longer.
Honestly it is so funny how liberals act like this that you can’t acknowledge a bad thing about the protected class like black IQ(I’m a black person btw). A non-racist will see that and quote if it is true dispassionately but acknowledge it if it is true with the understanding that it doesn’t mean blacks are any lesser for being less intelligent
>They have stronger immune systems and are protected from certain genetic conditions that affect only men
On the flipside they're also more likely to have autoimmune disorders than men because of this.
>They have stronger immune systems
No they fucking don't lmao, women are sick at least twice as much as men >and are protected from certain genetic conditions that affect only men,
That is true, because they have a backup of all their genes. The X chromosome contains around 900 genes and women have a spare, so 1,800 genes in total. The Y chromosome only contains 60 and overwrites the X, so we have just under 1,000 genes and if a male attribute is damaged then the female X takes over. >explaining partly why women live so much longer.
Maybe, but hundreds of millions of men dying in WW2 is still the largest reason for longer average female lifespan, and that won't change until that generation dies. The overwhelming majority of over 80s are women because so many men died in wars, dragging the average male life expectancy down.
>Maybe, but hundreds of millions of men dying in WW2 is still the largest reason for longer average female lifespan, and that won't change until that generation dies. The overwhelming majority of over 80s are women because so many men died in wars, dragging the average male life expectancy down.
Man the gap exists even in countries that didn't partecipate in ww2. Men are almost exclusively emoployed in pretty much every job with negative effect on one's long term health, I dare say that's more of a factor in the longevity gap than fucking ww2 in 2022.
>Central to Saini's argument is that the strength—bodily and intellectually—of women has been consistently undervalued by scientists. "Women also have strength, and thinking about women as the weaker sex is wrong," she says. "Women are biologically better survivors from the moment they're born. They have stronger immune systems and are protected from certain genetic conditions that affect only men, explaining partly why women live so much longer." >Saini becomes passionate as she talks about how the idea of men as hunter-gatherers, undertaking the bulk of physical exertion, and women as domestic caregivers, is just that—an idea, a social construct we've imposed on ourselves. But the reality, both historically and in developing countries around the world, is very different. >"Women all over the world work as hard as men. Most women do really hard, back-breaking labor, every single day," Saini argues. "I'm from India, and when you travel back there you see women are doing the exact same amount of labor, if not more, that men are doing. That's a fact of history that goes back thousands of years ago, before patriarchy existed." >Ultimately, Saini's ambition is no less than a new scientific model, one that recognizes scientists are fallible and as subject to human prejudice as any other discipline. Things are already changing, she says. >"There's a new story being written, and as women have entered sciences and our society has become a lot more enlightened, we're getting a very different portrait," she explains. "I want women to see that equality is not just a political ideal. We are just as biologically capable."
>Saini's ambition is no less than a new scientific model, one that recognizes scientists are fallible and as subject to human prejudice as any other discipline
Its funny, she's right about that point, but she doesn't apply that same argument to her own prejudices and ideology.
The old scientific model is supposed to do this as well by consideration of null hypothesis and reproducibility of research. Not that it functions that well anyhow
As well as meta-analysis and funnel plots. This smells of an excuse to remove standards so politically connected brown and/or female incompetents can get into prestigious journals and wear them as a skinsuit as they run them into the ground (not that prestigious journals were ever *that* great at filtering bullshit, but the mediocre brown women will certainly do worse).
Put Saini in a ring with me and see who gets out. I have minimal fighting experience and my right arm is kinda useless rn because of a surgery. She can even have a baseball bat.
>Ultimately, Saini's ambition is no less than a new scientific model, one that recognizes scientists are fallible and as subject to human prejudice as any other discipline
I wonder if she applies the same principle to vaccine studies?
>Saini's ambition is no less than a new scientific model, one that recognizes scientists are fallible and as subject to human prejudice as any other discipline
Its funny, she's right about that point, but she doesn't apply that same argument to her own prejudices and ideology.
Just a dumb deconstruction of the concept of strength. The image that the article starts with makes you think that it is about physical strength but in the article itself she makes up a new definition of strength that has little to do with muscle and working out.
>I'm from India, and when you travel back there you see women are doing the exact same amount of labor, if not more, that men are doing
i saw women working on building sites in china, carrying a hod of bricks, if that it what the thing is called. but they are not common and it's probably not a desired job for a woman and only done due to poverty and necessity. but it would be silly to suggest the few dozen women i saw carrying 100lbs of bricks means that the average woman is as physically strong as the average man.
If his point is that women have excellent super endurance, hes right.
Women are often better ultra marathon runners and ultra distance cyclists than men. They are much much better ultra endurance swimmers probably due to extra fat.
Women will never beat men in the regular marathon, triathlon, speed climbing, or any other typical endurance or strength sport.
But when the endurance activity is 24hr+ women start to match or exceed men.
Maybe it's something to do with evolutionary adaptation for spending hours in labor?
>Women are often better ultra marathon runners and ultra distance cyclists than men.
How often is "often" in this instance? Because of it's less than 50% of the time, then men are still stronger. Do women hold more records in these competitions than men do, something like that? Are there objective data showing that when have a general advantage in those activities?
The thing about swimming is really interesting though I'd never thought about the body fat angle
>The thing about swimming is really interesting though I'd never thought about the body fat angle
pic is one of the best european open water extreme swimmers
>intellectually
Men are over represented at both extremes of the IQ spectrum to include being the smartest >stronger immune systems
This is true, but ironically its also the reason that women have more autoimmune diseases. Women's immune systems are hyperactive to the point where its attack their own bodies. Double ironic is that pregnancy suppresses the woman's immune system and the theory is that because women are having less pregnancies they're actually having more autoimmune disorders >why women live so much longer
The male body is subject to more physical stress through being both larger and performing more physical work. Its like saying that an engine operating at moderate RPMs lasts longer than one that's constantly getting redlined... >Women all over the world work as hard as men. Most women do really hard, back-breaking labor, every single day
Great, so why are men so over represented in all the "icky jobs". Where are the all the women fighting to be garbage collectors?
Agreed.
And I have a female cousin that is a journalist. She will fiercely defend the most inane shit some media outlet spews in order to preserve the "mainstream journalism is good journalism" narrative.
She wouldn't be missed.
I can't believe I seriously have to check whether this is real or a fake one made for parody. I suspect it's both real and fake - let me explain...
It's probably real in that they probably posted this judging by the responses to this thread. However it's probably fake in that they are baiting to get a reaction. They know it's an absurd thing to say, so they're pushing buttons. They get their clicks, they get their virtue signalling, and so on.
yeah you're wrong, they use the same rating system as men. they do have lower ELO requirements for women-specific titles though (Woman Grandmaster/etc).
This is like hearing someone say "I could do that if I tried" and they never bother trying it ever, but speaking for the entire female gender. 25 years ago, such a ridiculous assertion would get you fired from your job as a writer, so all those useless egotistical writers conglomerated into shitpiece editorials like Vice media, and influenced the entirety of media to sink to new lows. On the other hand, I wonder how many retarded women read this and got crushed by a barbell.. This is conflicting as I only seek truth, and yet love seeing stupid people get hurt/die.
>broadly dot vice >broadly
It's a glorified opinion piece.
They claim that scientists are sexist for acknowledging innate and measurable biological differences between the sexes. Literally less than nothing.
the only way to destroy them is ignoring them and acting masculine irl as if globohomo didnt brainwash the normalfags for the last few decades. just act like a man from 30 years ago and dgaf
>wow I'm wamiz I am so strong by body weight >one hit rag dolls her across the room through the wall shattering all her bones
ok then why can't you punch women then if they're so strong?
Women on average have 40% less upper body strength because they have massive fat deposits where you would have pecs instead. That is just the shape of our body not even accounting for differences in testosterone to allow for significantly more muscle building. Women can have maybe somewhat comparable leg strength MAYBE but not even close overall.
Sciooence has also made "us" -mistakenly- believe that a strain of the common cold with a mortality rate of like 0.012% was going to kill us all unless we put on cuck muzzles in universities and at work.
If this was true, trannies wouldn't be breaking all their records.
Their response to this would be UHM ACKSHUALLY TRANSWOMEN ARE JUST WOMEN.
Wise
Lets change all sports to weight classes only .... we will see who is better at sports pretty quick
Already exists, most major sports leagues don't have any rules that prevents female players from participating.
Yep women can play in the NFL, MLB, NHL and surprising the NBA. They are all legally gender neutral leagues
they aren't?
Are you asking a question?
https://nordiclifting.com/blogs/fitness/transgender-broke-weightlifting-records-by-winning-2-medals-in-iwf
https://abc3340.com/news/nation-world/trans-swimmer-breaks-pool-record-during-win-at-ivy-league-championships-university-pennsylvania-ncaa-transgender-athlete-lia-thomas-freestyle-swimmer-upenn-lgbtq-usa-policy-rule
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/us-students-and-parents-outraged-after-transgender-teen-sprinter-breaks-record/DVODNJX73JZ5FNCYJO53DDYVP4/
So you're saying that women are breaking records set by other women?
>YWNBAW
Sorry can't hear you, I'm destroying feminism from the inside.
If that's your reason to go trans, then I salute you, brot- I mean, sister.
Still, kys.
Thanks for respecting my pronouns
no
bravest post on IST right now
>sha la la la la la you’re a fag
>you’re just a man in drag
>you’ll never be a girl (no no)
>sha la la la la la
>why oh why
>your chromosomes don’t lie
>you’ll never be a girl
Obviously women are stronger, but this “trannies breaking all the records” thing simply hasn’t happened yet.
Only because there aren’t enough trannies, yet.
My first thought was that this would be to do with the definition of women including males.
>All these "fbbp" replies
This hasn't happened yet, lmao.
hohoho
*If this WERE true
Hypothetical. Subjunctive mood.
Whats the difference can you elaborate
both sound good to me in my head
They both are perfectly fine, he's just being pedantic.
why aren’t born female trannies competing in male boxing?
gay poster, best poster
>Vice
I heard buzzfeed has lost a ton of revenue, can't be any different than this shit
It's kept going by ~~*funding*~~ to spew out this nonsense
This shit seems trivial in a vacuum but when you zoom out and view it holistically, we have a serious communist problem.
Media has two purposes.
>1) To manufacture consensus
>2) To engage
This piece is of the latter. They don't believe a fucking word they're saying, they just want you to click the link. Oh the headline made you angry? Better click the link and see just how SILLY these journalists are!
Probably a clickbait article like "yeah men are physically stronger but VAGINAS can give birth sooooo"
Great so I guess the military standards should be equal for the sexes and men and women should compete together in the same sports.
https://boysvswomen.com/#/
/thread
Damn, devastating
Ooofff. Yeah that def shows a huge difference. Womens best in the world vs high school boys. It gets even crazier when you compare mens olympic records to women.
Anyhoo, I wish I was a teenage thot. I have severe pussy envy and women jealousy. At least I was born a good looking guy. I couldn’t imagine being horrid looking and having vagina envy, that would be torture. At least I can still fuck women.
You're an autogynephile
Makes sense. I know I am not trans as I am very masculine and will not transition. I’d make a horrid woman as I am a mesomorph, 5’10” @ 184, square cut jaw.
But yeah, wish I could wear cute little dresses and skirts outside the bedroom. Pussy envy is crazy, lol.
Hans get the gas
>top adult women in the world wouldn't even qualify to compete at the level of high schoolers
Goddamn
Reminder karsten braasch (rank 203) beat both williams sister back to back while intentionally playing badly and have spent the morning drinking and playing golf.
Tennis isn't even a sport where men have a big physical advantage since it's mostly about technique/strategy and a little bit of cardio. Could you imagine the 203-ranked male wrestler against a female world champion? Or a semipro men's rugby team playing a match against the best women's rugby team in the world? Even having that matchup would be dangerous for the women.
Is football the only sport where there is no professional women's league?
What football? There is professional women's rugby and soccer. It's just no one cares about either.
No I mean American Football. As far as I'm aware there is no real women's team at all.
Oh dunno shit about handegg aside fr the fact that they're only on the field for 3 mins before they swap teams for some reason. Seems retarded
Most motorsports are gender neutral and typically end up male dominated.
Certain gymnastics divisions are male / female only. For example women don't do the rings nor the parallel bars, while men don't do the bouncy floor thing or the uneven bars.
There is no professional women's sumo wrestling division.
I'm sure there are some other niche sports out there.
Men do do "the bouncy floor thing". It's called floor. The alternate apparatus for women are just cope because they're incapable of being competitive on those apparatus.
Motocross is super upper body intensive too. I would say the same is true of F1 in terms of withstanding g force in turns. Also women can't drive so
Oh damn I didn't realize men did the floor competition. Thanks for fixing that.
And yeah all racing is brutal on the body, with F1 in particular for exceeding lateral forces of 3Gs at the high speed circuits.
>professional women's sumo wrestling division.
Imagine the smell
Boston and Minnesota are playing the women's championship right now
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Fastest officially recogised serve for men is 157.2mph (263kmh)
Fastest officially recognised serve for women is 136.7mph (220kmh)
A 20mph difference is pretty fucking significant. To put it in perspective that's roughly the difference between a school zone and freeway speed limit here.
I agree with your fundamental point but comparing outliers is generally a poor way to argue it
Athletes by their nature are outliers
So there is one event where olympic women can beat high school boys. This tracks with what I've heard about extreme endurance events, that women can actually compete with men, i.e. that when you remove strength, speed, and agility from the equation and get down to pure endurance they have a chance.
Fucking BRVTAL
let me guess:
>according to bodyweight to strength ratio women are somewhat close to men in lower-body centric lifts up till an advanced lifter level
The open weight (100kg+) women's squat record in ausfailia is 5kg less than the 63kg men's squat record so even that's demonstrably bullshit.
To view an outlier as representative of a group as a whole is just one of the many ways they are destroying science. The vice article even proposes a "new scientific model" - fucking huh?
Looking at averages instead of one outlier (who is probably built like a man anyway), you get a much better picture that women are, in fact, the weaker sex.
>up till an advanced lifter level
read
Untrained/novice for 80kg man
Untrained/novice for 80kg woman
>OHP
>Empty bar
>One rep max
Holy shit is this real girls are actually that weak that's so fucking hot
lmao when I first started going to the gym I was going with these two really strong lads who would do a lot of heavy sets on OHP. The first time, I started with 0.25plate on each side but once we were a few sets in and I was straining to do the empty bar. They took their weight off when it was my turn and just put the clips on lol.
>tfw when you can't finish your last set of >lmao1clip
Women are extremely weak.
>Read
No. Men are stronger way before advanced lifter level. Even at novice they dominate every weight class.
I've seen a 40kg midget squat 2.5pl8 for reps.
No to quote:
> Women are biologically better survivors from the moment they're born. They have stronger immune systems and are protected from certain genetic conditions that affect only men, explaining partly why women live so much longer.
Honestly it is so funny how liberals act like this that you can’t acknowledge a bad thing about the protected class like black IQ(I’m a black person btw). A non-racist will see that and quote if it is true dispassionately but acknowledge it if it is true with the understanding that it doesn’t mean blacks are any lesser for being less intelligent
>On average
Avoid self-deprecation at all costs brother
>They have stronger immune systems and are protected from certain genetic conditions that affect only men
On the flipside they're also more likely to have autoimmune disorders than men because of this.
>(I’m a black person btw)
Post body king. Make the LULZ tourists angry
I'm a racist and even I aknowledge that being genetically different or even inferior in some way doesn't make people worth less. Being a cunt does.
>I’m a black person btw
>certain genetic conditions that affect only men
women can get testicular cancer too, bigots.
>They have stronger immune systems
No they fucking don't lmao, women are sick at least twice as much as men
>and are protected from certain genetic conditions that affect only men,
That is true, because they have a backup of all their genes. The X chromosome contains around 900 genes and women have a spare, so 1,800 genes in total. The Y chromosome only contains 60 and overwrites the X, so we have just under 1,000 genes and if a male attribute is damaged then the female X takes over.
>explaining partly why women live so much longer.
Maybe, but hundreds of millions of men dying in WW2 is still the largest reason for longer average female lifespan, and that won't change until that generation dies. The overwhelming majority of over 80s are women because so many men died in wars, dragging the average male life expectancy down.
>Maybe, but hundreds of millions of men dying in WW2 is still the largest reason for longer average female lifespan, and that won't change until that generation dies. The overwhelming majority of over 80s are women because so many men died in wars, dragging the average male life expectancy down.
Man the gap exists even in countries that didn't partecipate in ww2. Men are almost exclusively emoployed in pretty much every job with negative effect on one's long term health, I dare say that's more of a factor in the longevity gap than fucking ww2 in 2022.
Article conflates endurance and immune system? and physical strength. Nonsense.
>https://www.vice.com/en/article/vbgkpx/inferior-angela-saini-book-interview
>Central to Saini's argument is that the strength—bodily and intellectually—of women has been consistently undervalued by scientists. "Women also have strength, and thinking about women as the weaker sex is wrong," she says. "Women are biologically better survivors from the moment they're born. They have stronger immune systems and are protected from certain genetic conditions that affect only men, explaining partly why women live so much longer."
>Saini becomes passionate as she talks about how the idea of men as hunter-gatherers, undertaking the bulk of physical exertion, and women as domestic caregivers, is just that—an idea, a social construct we've imposed on ourselves. But the reality, both historically and in developing countries around the world, is very different.
>"Women all over the world work as hard as men. Most women do really hard, back-breaking labor, every single day," Saini argues. "I'm from India, and when you travel back there you see women are doing the exact same amount of labor, if not more, that men are doing. That's a fact of history that goes back thousands of years ago, before patriarchy existed."
>Ultimately, Saini's ambition is no less than a new scientific model, one that recognizes scientists are fallible and as subject to human prejudice as any other discipline. Things are already changing, she says.
>"There's a new story being written, and as women have entered sciences and our society has become a lot more enlightened, we're getting a very different portrait," she explains. "I want women to see that equality is not just a political ideal. We are just as biologically capable."
it's nothing. platitudes.
Modern journalism and science is misconstrued information presented to generate clicks from cunts that don't bother to read anything but the headlines
>intellectually
Hmmm, I wonder if there is a single woman in the top 100 chess grandmasters
Judit polgar wiped the floor with Magnus chudsen literally this week
>a blitz game in the park
Lmao. Post her score in classical against Magnus, Kasparov and Kramnik
>Saini's ambition is no less than a new scientific model, one that recognizes scientists are fallible and as subject to human prejudice as any other discipline
Its funny, she's right about that point, but she doesn't apply that same argument to her own prejudices and ideology.
maximum solipsism
The old scientific model is supposed to do this as well by consideration of null hypothesis and reproducibility of research. Not that it functions that well anyhow
As well as meta-analysis and funnel plots. This smells of an excuse to remove standards so politically connected brown and/or female incompetents can get into prestigious journals and wear them as a skinsuit as they run them into the ground (not that prestigious journals were ever *that* great at filtering bullshit, but the mediocre brown women will certainly do worse).
Put Saini in a ring with me and see who gets out. I have minimal fighting experience and my right arm is kinda useless rn because of a surgery. She can even have a baseball bat.
>linking the article to generate clicks from IST
~~*you*~~ need to leave
>Ultimately, Saini's ambition is no less than a new scientific model, one that recognizes scientists are fallible and as subject to human prejudice as any other discipline
I wonder if she applies the same principle to vaccine studies?
>obscuring physical strength realities confirmed by bell curves to peddle feelgood red herrings
We don't deserve the scientific method.
Just a dumb deconstruction of the concept of strength. The image that the article starts with makes you think that it is about physical strength but in the article itself she makes up a new definition of strength that has little to do with muscle and working out.
So that bitch CAN take the trash out after all
>I'm from India, and when you travel back there you see women are doing the exact same amount of labor, if not more, that men are doing
i saw women working on building sites in china, carrying a hod of bricks, if that it what the thing is called. but they are not common and it's probably not a desired job for a woman and only done due to poverty and necessity. but it would be silly to suggest the few dozen women i saw carrying 100lbs of bricks means that the average woman is as physically strong as the average man.
If his point is that women have excellent super endurance, hes right.
Women are often better ultra marathon runners and ultra distance cyclists than men. They are much much better ultra endurance swimmers probably due to extra fat.
Women will never beat men in the regular marathon, triathlon, speed climbing, or any other typical endurance or strength sport.
But when the endurance activity is 24hr+ women start to match or exceed men.
Maybe it's something to do with evolutionary adaptation for spending hours in labor?
>Women are often better ultra marathon runners and ultra distance cyclists than men.
How often is "often" in this instance? Because of it's less than 50% of the time, then men are still stronger. Do women hold more records in these competitions than men do, something like that? Are there objective data showing that when have a general advantage in those activities?
The thing about swimming is really interesting though I'd never thought about the body fat angle
>The thing about swimming is really interesting though I'd never thought about the body fat angle
pic is one of the best european open water extreme swimmers
>intellectually
Men are over represented at both extremes of the IQ spectrum to include being the smartest
>stronger immune systems
This is true, but ironically its also the reason that women have more autoimmune diseases. Women's immune systems are hyperactive to the point where its attack their own bodies. Double ironic is that pregnancy suppresses the woman's immune system and the theory is that because women are having less pregnancies they're actually having more autoimmune disorders
>why women live so much longer
The male body is subject to more physical stress through being both larger and performing more physical work. Its like saying that an engine operating at moderate RPMs lasts longer than one that's constantly getting redlined...
>Women all over the world work as hard as men. Most women do really hard, back-breaking labor, every single day
Great, so why are men so over represented in all the "icky jobs". Where are the all the women fighting to be garbage collectors?
>scientists can be wrong
white supremacist detected
Yes.
>~~*science*~~™
i wish more people thought this way so at some point we got mixed sports so i can watch women lose in every sport forever
All journalists should be killed on sight
Not in minecraft but in real life
Agreed.
And I have a female cousin that is a journalist. She will fiercely defend the most inane shit some media outlet spews in order to preserve the "mainstream journalism is good journalism" narrative.
She wouldn't be missed.
Pro women's hockey teams peak versus junior teams - like basically elite high school
I can't believe I seriously have to check whether this is real or a fake one made for parody. I suspect it's both real and fake - let me explain...
It's probably real in that they probably posted this judging by the responses to this thread. However it's probably fake in that they are baiting to get a reaction. They know it's an absurd thing to say, so they're pushing buttons. They get their clicks, they get their virtue signalling, and so on.
Hou Yifan is the best woman and ranked 101, however has been as high as 55.
So what you're saying is there isn't one (1) female in the top 100 players
thats sexist somebody should do something about that
correct me if im wrong but dont female chess players literally get a free ratings boost?
yeah you're wrong, they use the same rating system as men. they do have lower ELO requirements for women-specific titles though (Woman Grandmaster/etc).
I don't know the elo system very well, but doesn't having women only tournaments boost their rating?
Don't believe scientists, got it.
If that's true, why in Olympics men have much better results? Be it weight lifting, sprinting, marathon running etc
How did they debunked this?
>Science
I stopped reading right there.
This is like hearing someone say "I could do that if I tried" and they never bother trying it ever, but speaking for the entire female gender. 25 years ago, such a ridiculous assertion would get you fired from your job as a writer, so all those useless egotistical writers conglomerated into shitpiece editorials like Vice media, and influenced the entirety of media to sink to new lows. On the other hand, I wonder how many retarded women read this and got crushed by a barbell.. This is conflicting as I only seek truth, and yet love seeing stupid people get hurt/die.
>broadly dot vice
>broadly
It's a glorified opinion piece.
They claim that scientists are sexist for acknowledging innate and measurable biological differences between the sexes. Literally less than nothing.
No, praise the God Emperor of Mankind for his wisdom.
Only in death does duty end.
How come there's these guys but also normal humans as separate factions? They even both worship the emporer so why fight?
All women should be beaten down hard, both physically as well as mentally.
the only way to destroy them is ignoring them and acting masculine irl as if globohomo didnt brainwash the normalfags for the last few decades. just act like a man from 30 years ago and dgaf
ProTip: When shit-tier leftist sites use the word science, you can be completely assured it is 100% bullshit.
>wow I'm wamiz I am so strong by body weight
>one hit rag dolls her across the room through the wall shattering all her bones
ok then why can't you punch women then if they're so strong?
Women on average have 40% less upper body strength because they have massive fat deposits where you would have pecs instead. That is just the shape of our body not even accounting for differences in testosterone to allow for significantly more muscle building. Women can have maybe somewhat comparable leg strength MAYBE but not even close overall.
I don't think anyone actually believes this
>Women on average have 40% less upper body strength
50% actually, approx 65% in the lower body
>women are weaker than men
we'll see about that
Please have mercy sir
Sciooence has also made "us" -mistakenly- believe that a strain of the common cold with a mortality rate of like 0.012% was going to kill us all unless we put on cuck muzzles in universities and at work.