And he looks it. A well kept 42 year old man, but for the amount of effort he puts in, it's not even shocking. Like, yeah you dye your hair and you kept in shape but... Looking "beautiful" is your life now. I'm not bowled over by the results.
His face looks far more youthful than that of 99.9% of 42 year old men. However, that is superficial.
Additionally, he touts fitness comparable or superior to that of an 18 year old, but he takes TRT...
>Besides, most 42 year olds have young children and work. He doesn't have either.
This is just awful cope.
He has three kids. And the whole reason he's doing this is because he became a multimillionaire by being a successful entrepreneur.
Oh, wait. Nevermind. Your argument was that "normal" 42yo men look old and haggard because they have to wageslave and change diapers? That's a pretty bad argument too.
And he looks it. A well kept 42 year old man, but for the amount of effort he puts in, it's not even shocking. Like, yeah you dye your hair and you kept in shape but... Looking "beautiful" is your life now. I'm not bowled over by the results.
Agreed. Not that impressive. He is in shape and all, but it's not like you can't tell his age, just a well kept 42 yo. If he was 70 and looked like that, I'd be impressed. He is just doing this for the headlines and people are giving that attention to him. If he quits a few months from now, no one will care.
Oh, wait. Nevermind. Your argument was that "normal" 42yo men look old and haggard because they have to wageslave and change diapers? That's a pretty bad argument too.
His argument makes sense, it's not that the guy will gain extra wrinkles for it, but if you are wageslave changing diapers you don't have that much time or money to do skin care everyday and whatever else he does.
He's 46 now, and there's no denying that he looks great for his age, but you're right, he basically looks how you'd expect a rich person who obsesses over their own self-care to look. I'm curious to know how this guy will look in 10-15 years. By then it should be obvious if he's actually slowed his aging down or not
>Looking "beautiful" is your life now. I'm not bowled over by the results.
I think it seems vain when you think of him doing it just for himself but he is actually conducting genuine research using himself and testing what the processes of aging are
there's a lot worse hobbies
Every thread we have to explain to retards like you that he is trying to de-age himself physiologically. So his bloods show up like a young man's. It's not fucking hard to follow you ugly idiot.
So all I have to do to get a girl to think I'm slightly younger is drink blood and spend millions of dollars and every hour of the day devoted to my skincare routine?
I am the same age as him and have better skin. He looks his age. The difference is unlike him I don't have health problems because I'm not stuffing my mouth with man-made foods and pills every day.
There have been videos where he showed his skin care regimen and he was basically just using red light therapy and over-the-counter products that millions of normies are using. The problem is that his "protocol" includes a million different things, and it's hard to tell what's actually useful and which things are a waste of time/money
>46 >Rich as fuck >Nothing to do, >but too old to risk seriously harming yourself >"I know!" >"I'll spend my riches on skincare and megaphones so everyone will give me attention!"
Oh, a woman, of course.
It's not working. He looks like a 70 year old who dyes his hair and takes steroids.
In some of his pics you can even see he's got those mrsa sores that old folks get in low-cost nursing homes.
I know manual laborers in their 60s who spend their free time smoking cigars and riding motorcycles with no shirt on that look more youthful than this bloke.
I believe that BJ may FEEL young, but he does not LOOK young.
going on in Thailand, sponsored by a Thai billionaire. Here is what they are doing: >first they selected bunch of healthy 18-20 year old male teenagers with good skeletal and mental development and no bad habits >tested them for broad range of health/aging markers
This is supposed to be the gold standard of human health, what they aim to achieve or get closer to. >then they selected 48 men aged between 50-60 in good health, low-average bodyfat >all live in a sanatorium (no other patients) >split into 5 groups (one small control group) and given different diets and supplements >doctors regularly take blood/piss/shit test and monitor their progress across huge number of biomarkers >gradually decrease/eliminate foods/supplements that have statistically negative effects >gradually increase foods/supplements that have positive effects
The first stage is supposed to be finding the optimal diet and vitamin/mineral intake. After this established they will continue by testing different supplements to conquer aging. The whole experiment is going on for 14 months now and they are getting somewhat close to finding the perfect diet. All subjects are healthy, happy and except control group, feel much better. So far only one subject was kicked out of the program because he got caught bringing alcohol from outside at night. Initially they followed different exercise regimens, but in the first six months they found optimal exercise routine and now all subjects follow the same program.
The whole experiment is extremely well organized and well funded. This place has amazing gym, swimming pool, huge park and the food is here is of highest quality. Olive oil smells amazing and even potatoes tastes different. Nurses, chiefs, coaches cater to every need subjects can have. Doctor in charge is a mad scientist from Korea and another Thai doctor helping him. Will continue below.
The optimal exercise routine was "found" before I joined in. It might not be perfect, but it is optimal in a sense that any further changes don't yield significant health improvements. So here is the routine: >very basic upper/lower split once a week (monday/wednesday) >monday squats 3x5 and leg curls 3x8 >wednesday bp 3x5, one arm press 3x8, pendlay row 3x5, face pull 3x8 >both done at 11am - 12am, followed by a lunch >solid cardio (running, swimming or cycling) session at 7pm, where subjects need to burn 400-500 calories >subjects need to do 20k steps during the day
The optimal exercise routine was "found" before I joined in. It might not be perfect, but it is optimal in a sense that any further changes don't yield significant health improvements. So here is the routine: >very basic upper/lower split once a week (monday/wednesday) >monday squats 3x5 and leg curls 3x8 >wednesday bp 3x5, one arm press 3x8, pendlay row 3x5, face pull 3x8 >both done at 11am - 12am, followed by a lunch >solid cardio (running, swimming or cycling) session at 7pm, where subjects need to burn 400-500 calories >subjects need to do 20k steps during the day
continue... diet.
It's found that the best is to it twice a day, but timing doesn't really matter. Breakfast - lunch, breakfast - dinner, lunch - dinner all equally good. When I joined some of subjects were eating lunch-dinner and some breakfast - lunch, but now everybody switched to lunch - dinner. Subjects prefer to wake up and go for a long walk, because they need get in 20k steps. They are still playing with diet among several groups, but it's progressively shaping into what it seems to be a perfect diet in some groups. It's high in protein, high in fat and moderate in carbs. White rice, white bread and processed food were eliminated from the very beginning as they were assumed to be bad. Diets in some groups are getting very interesting because they have somewhat dry main dishes and ridiculously oily salads with chunks of beef tallow. Some even drink molten butter. Anyway, here what we have at this point: >all grains, potatoes, cassava, wheat products(bread, pasta....) are bad
the best of grains are barley and oats, but even they seem to have negative effects on biomarkers. All of these are completely eliminated at this point, but couple groups are still eating various beans. Carbs come from vegetables like cabbage, broccoli, broccoli sprouts, brussels sprouts, carrots, pumpkins, tomatoes... Foods are fried without oil (using small amounts of bone broth) >all sorts of cheese are terrible
raw goat cheese is the least bad cheese, but still shouldn't be consumed >all dairy is bad in general
kefir and whole yoghurt have positive effects if diet is deficient in protein and K2, otherwise they are net negative too >all seed oils are bad
only uncooked extra virgin olive oil in salads is good. >all nuts and seeds should be avoided
they only use crushed flaxseeds and chia seeds in salads
continue below...
continue... >pork, beef, horse meat, lamb and goat all not healthy >Some types of fish: salmon, sardines, herring and mackerel are healthy >Chicken, duck, quail, goose and other birds are neutral >all shellfish are slightly negative
Basically, the meals here are becoming like this: large portion of vegetables with ton of fish covered with molten butter, plus large bowl of oily salad, either with tallow chunks or olive oil or both. Twice a day. Some groups are also taking protein supplement of 20g of gelatin + 20g of whey protein. And some groups are eating small piece of liver almost every day. Continue...
I'm back. I forgot few things in my previous posts about diet. All groups eat at least one egg a day and some groups eat 4-5 eggs every day. They put a lot of garlic in salads and recently they started putting nutritional yeast in all salads. I'm writing from top of my head what I observed and know from others working here, I don't have protocols.
post link to article or something, i want to read more
I'm not sure if anything will be published ever. The whole thing is sponsored by a Thai billionaire who wants to find a solution for aging. He doesn't care about publishing or earning money.
The optimal exercise routine was "found" before I joined in. It might not be perfect, but it is optimal in a sense that any further changes don't yield significant health improvements. So here is the routine: >very basic upper/lower split once a week (monday/wednesday) >monday squats 3x5 and leg curls 3x8 >wednesday bp 3x5, one arm press 3x8, pendlay row 3x5, face pull 3x8 >both done at 11am - 12am, followed by a lunch >solid cardio (running, swimming or cycling) session at 7pm, where subjects need to burn 400-500 calories >subjects need to do 20k steps during the day
[...]
continue... diet.
It's found that the best is to it twice a day, but timing doesn't really matter. Breakfast - lunch, breakfast - dinner, lunch - dinner all equally good. When I joined some of subjects were eating lunch-dinner and some breakfast - lunch, but now everybody switched to lunch - dinner. Subjects prefer to wake up and go for a long walk, because they need get in 20k steps. They are still playing with diet among several groups, but it's progressively shaping into what it seems to be a perfect diet in some groups. It's high in protein, high in fat and moderate in carbs. White rice, white bread and processed food were eliminated from the very beginning as they were assumed to be bad. Diets in some groups are getting very interesting because they have somewhat dry main dishes and ridiculously oily salads with chunks of beef tallow. Some even drink molten butter. Anyway, here what we have at this point: >all grains, potatoes, cassava, wheat products(bread, pasta....) are bad
the best of grains are barley and oats, but even they seem to have negative effects on biomarkers. All of these are completely eliminated at this point, but couple groups are still eating various beans. Carbs come from vegetables like cabbage, broccoli, broccoli sprouts, brussels sprouts, carrots, pumpkins, tomatoes... Foods are fried without oil (using small amounts of bone broth) >all sorts of cheese are terrible
raw goat cheese is the least bad cheese, but still shouldn't be consumed >all dairy is bad in general
kefir and whole yoghurt have positive effects if diet is deficient in protein and K2, otherwise they are net negative too >all seed oils are bad
only uncooked extra virgin olive oil in salads is good. >all nuts and seeds should be avoided
they only use crushed flaxseeds and chia seeds in salads
continue below...
continue... >pork, beef, horse meat, lamb and goat all not healthy >Some types of fish: salmon, sardines, herring and mackerel are healthy >Chicken, duck, quail, goose and other birds are neutral >all shellfish are slightly negative
Basically, the meals here are becoming like this: large portion of vegetables with ton of fish covered with molten butter, plus large bowl of oily salad, either with tallow chunks or olive oil or both. Twice a day. Some groups are also taking protein supplement of 20g of gelatin + 20g of whey protein. And some groups are eating small piece of liver almost every day. Continue...
what exactly are they trying to find out?
these people already have good genetics and maybe lifestyle choices. so why not study these choices? and not just their choices, but their parents' and grandparents' choices?
instead they stick them in a jail and force them to live the way they want them to live. i mean, these people already have good genes, so even a couple years of bad habits won't reverse all of that. especially the 18 year olds. so with good food and carefree lifestyle, they can go on indefinitely. but that's not what we're trying to find out. but how did they get there in the first place. what do they do that make them have "good skeletal and mental development"? what do the 50 year old do that make them be in good health and have low bodyfat?
and why did they choose these kind of activities for the participants? i mean all they're doing is walk 20k steps and do a bit of exercises. who gets to live a life like this? why don't they have them do something to test their mental abilities? why didn't they find a mathematician or a musician and ask them what they eat and how they live? or if they are purely concerned with long life, why not find some healthy 90 year olds and talk to them? it just seems very superficial.
>White rice, white bread and processed food were eliminated from the very beginning as they were assumed to be bad
stupid assumption. why is "processed food" lump in together with white rice and white bread?
the rest of the post is too lacking in details to reply to. i dont know what they found out how each food effected what measurement.
No, stop moving goal posts. What I wrote was very simple. A large portion of retirees have the savings and leisure time to be able to live that kind of a lifestyle if they so chose.
The rhetorical question was "who gets to live a life like this?"
Well, lots of people get to, actually. That doesn't mean they do.
>Well, lots of people get to, actually. That doesn't mean they do.
ok so what's the point? in case you are an autist who doesnt understand the bigger scope of the question, answering the question in a literal sense serves no purpose if you can't get them to live like that. whether or not they can is immaterial.
20k steps is 3 hours of walking. it's hard enough getting people to walk 30 minutes everyday nevermind 3 hours. to get people to walk for 3 hours plus lifting plus extra cardio, is literally impossible.
They are to solve aging in a honest way. The plan is to do it step by step >Find optimal exercise routine (done) >Find optimal diet >Find optimal daily intake of vitamins and minerals >Test various medicines to reverse aging
The idea is that even if you are healthy and have good diet, exercise routine and take all necessary vitamins and minerals you still will continue aging. However, if you are not healthy, like if you have cancer or obesity, it will interfere with anti-aging treatment and will make it more difficult to establish what exactly works.
18 year olds are not kept here, they were just tested in the beginning to establish a high benchmark for health biomarkers. >why is "processed food" lump in together with white rice and white bread?
by processed food I mean junk like chips and chocolate bars. I also don't know exactly how they establish which food has positive/negative effects, but I know that they are tweaking their diets and taking tests regularly for biomarkers, so I'm sure they are figuring it out what improves health and what doesn't. >the rest of the post is too lacking in details
correct, because I'm not a doctor here and I don't have access to all data. By the way putting 20k hands is not difficult, they subjects here usually done with it by 11 am and most walk 25k+ steps by the end of the day easily.
[...]
[...]
continue...
Minerals and vitamins. These are not very clear yet, but from what I know few things are determined. For example they used to give large doses, 10g+, of vitamin C, but now almost all subjects take 3g of vitamin C daily, spread across the day. They also take large doses of vitamin K2(mix of Mk4 and MK7) and large dose of vitamin D3 (50k - 100k iu) once a week. Some groups are taking vitamin B complex. >bad minerals: iron, copper >good minerals: magnesium, selenium, iodine
few other things that happened recently. Subjects were free to drink coffee or tea until recently, but then they suddenly completely removed both of them. Now subjects drink only water(with the exception of protein drink), but they didn't even notice the change. Nobody complained. Also just recently all groups started taking either tudca or Ox bile, but I don't know if it will continue or not. Also, they stopped doing cryotherapy, I think it doesn't make a difference. Most of the groups are still doing sauna 2-4 times a week.
Thanks for these posts. I appericiate them.
A few questions:
Do they eat fruits? How much fruits do they eat? Do the doctors consider fruits good or bad?
Do the participants just eat till satiated or do they have a set calories that they can eat based on maybe height and weight?
Same with macros. Do they just eat whatever they want (from the available "good" food) or does their food get measured for strict macro split? And if so, whats the ratio of carb/fat/protein?
What was the original 5 groups and what was the difference between the groups?
Why did they get rid of the 5 groups and have everybody follow the same protocal?
What are the biomarkers that they measure?
How did they come to the conclusion that the current exercise program is optimal?
Are the participants all Thai or are there other ethnicity?
How long do they plan on running this program?
I know its a lot of questions! I hope you find the time to answer them. Thanks.
1. During meal time all of them have access to some fruits like avocado, blueberry, durian... but not really forced to eat. I know that 1 group is required to eat pineapple from time to time. Overall I would say they eat very little fruits.
2. All participants have minimum requirements of 1 main dish and 1 salad in every meal. Once they finish both, they can eat more of either or both or some veggies/fruits available to them as much as they want. Nurses keep record of what they eat. Foods are very oily, so they don't a lot. No snacks between meals.
3. We still have same five groups, but their diets are converging and becoming similar. Initially some of them were eating once a day, some twice and some three times a day. Now all of them eating twice a day, lunch-dinner (though this their own choice). Also initially only one group wasn't eating grains, but gradually all groups dropped grains and potatoes. Although some groups are still eating beans. They still eat a lot of vegetables, so it's not keto diet by any means.
4. I don't know exactly what biomarkers they measure.
5. The exercises were already set when I arrived to replace one of workers here. I imagine they tweaked exercises until they stopped seeing improvements.
6. All participants are Thai.
7. I don't know for sure but I have verbal agreement to work at least two more years. It might continue for longer though. I don't think there is a time/money limit. My impression is that they are dead set on solving aging completely. They are slowly adding more supplements. Once they pinpoint diet I'm sure they will start playing with supplements more aggressively.
The optimal exercise routine was "found" before I joined in. It might not be perfect, but it is optimal in a sense that any further changes don't yield significant health improvements. So here is the routine: >very basic upper/lower split once a week (monday/wednesday) >monday squats 3x5 and leg curls 3x8 >wednesday bp 3x5, one arm press 3x8, pendlay row 3x5, face pull 3x8 >both done at 11am - 12am, followed by a lunch >solid cardio (running, swimming or cycling) session at 7pm, where subjects need to burn 400-500 calories >subjects need to do 20k steps during the day
[...]
continue... diet.
It's found that the best is to it twice a day, but timing doesn't really matter. Breakfast - lunch, breakfast - dinner, lunch - dinner all equally good. When I joined some of subjects were eating lunch-dinner and some breakfast - lunch, but now everybody switched to lunch - dinner. Subjects prefer to wake up and go for a long walk, because they need get in 20k steps. They are still playing with diet among several groups, but it's progressively shaping into what it seems to be a perfect diet in some groups. It's high in protein, high in fat and moderate in carbs. White rice, white bread and processed food were eliminated from the very beginning as they were assumed to be bad. Diets in some groups are getting very interesting because they have somewhat dry main dishes and ridiculously oily salads with chunks of beef tallow. Some even drink molten butter. Anyway, here what we have at this point: >all grains, potatoes, cassava, wheat products(bread, pasta....) are bad
the best of grains are barley and oats, but even they seem to have negative effects on biomarkers. All of these are completely eliminated at this point, but couple groups are still eating various beans. Carbs come from vegetables like cabbage, broccoli, broccoli sprouts, brussels sprouts, carrots, pumpkins, tomatoes... Foods are fried without oil (using small amounts of bone broth) >all sorts of cheese are terrible
raw goat cheese is the least bad cheese, but still shouldn't be consumed >all dairy is bad in general
kefir and whole yoghurt have positive effects if diet is deficient in protein and K2, otherwise they are net negative too >all seed oils are bad
only uncooked extra virgin olive oil in salads is good. >all nuts and seeds should be avoided
they only use crushed flaxseeds and chia seeds in salads
continue below...
continue...
Minerals and vitamins. These are not very clear yet, but from what I know few things are determined. For example they used to give large doses, 10g+, of vitamin C, but now almost all subjects take 3g of vitamin C daily, spread across the day. They also take large doses of vitamin K2(mix of Mk4 and MK7) and large dose of vitamin D3 (50k - 100k iu) once a week. Some groups are taking vitamin B complex. >bad minerals: iron, copper >good minerals: magnesium, selenium, iodine
few other things that happened recently. Subjects were free to drink coffee or tea until recently, but then they suddenly completely removed both of them. Now subjects drink only water(with the exception of protein drink), but they didn't even notice the change. Nobody complained. Also just recently all groups started taking either tudca or Ox bile, but I don't know if it will continue or not. Also, they stopped doing cryotherapy, I think it doesn't make a difference. Most of the groups are still doing sauna 2-4 times a week.
Just a bit disappointing he's a vegan. I would love see him eating wild duck, boar, deer. Let him do the wildest fucking things even if it's ethically repulsive. Start eating aborted embryo's and drink mommy's milk motherfucker. Go beyond reason and grasp immortality by the balls.
Seems gay tbh. Trying to keep some kind of "boyish" aesthetic well into your 40s is very homosexual. Men don't need to be never-wipe-my-ass disgusting or not have a skin routine, but age will generally effect men favorably.
His anti aging protocol costs him $2,000,000 a year and all it does is make him a 46 year old man that looks like an uncanny 30-something year old.
He probably has baby-faced genes to begin with, so my guess is he's just a living billboard used to sell expensive treatments to the desperate, vain, non-genetically-gifted consumers.
What's the shit he's really doing? There's no way he's telling people the actual peptides and drugs he's taking. He just tells goyim he's using red light therapy etc.
He's only been doing this for 5ish years, before that he was a fat slob. As another commenter said, it'll take 10 years we'll see if he can visibly reduce ageing
No idea why people get so triggered by this guy. Also how everyone on the internet think this guy looks so old but totally still get carded at 30 and everyone asks if they’re in their early 20s. I personally think it’s cool he’s serving as a test dummy free from the normal constraints of conducting a sanctioned scientific experiment. Really curious to see if the younger blood donations actually does something
>triggered
People who are extremely online can detect a grifter when they see one. I respect what he's doing, but at the same time I can clearly see his obvious grift: he has spent a LOT of money promoting himself online. You think Jesse James West, Will Tennyson, various other youtubers and sundry news networks just randomly decided to make videos on the guy? Of course not. Johnson is paying to be promoted. It's also clear that despite his superficial altruism his end goal is to monetize what he is doing: the first step appears to be by selling a branded olive oil. Someone made a video about this estimating Johnson's olive oil business has the potential to be worth ~$50 million.
Anyway, I'm certainly not denying his protocol may be effective, and I will keep an open mind and test some of these supplements and strategies out for myself.
>40 years old >cheat lighting
Lol, go look at any footage of him, dude's fucking skeletql and just does cardio all day while gobbling 150 different pills, it's peak mental illness
he eats only veggies and had fat injections done on his face.
he lost me. he should reevaluate his approach and fire some of the scamming israelite docs he employs
he does many things good and the only one the make most of his research public but the extreme low bf, the plastic surgeries, the idiotic diet and too much exercise is against the spirit of longevity.
Past a certain age, trying to look young backfires for men. You can see this in Tom Cruise vs Brad Pitt. Cruise is 60+ yo, but tries to look decades younger: disgusting. Pitt looks great, but nobody will say that he's younger than 45 or even 50.
This guy is going to get steroids legalized
Once he proves that injecting exogenous hormones is just a small but important part of your everyday skincare routine, you'll be able to buy test off the shelf in the beauty aisle at Walmart.
He was 76 when that picture was taken.
the israelites
For a start, it's a 42 year old man.
And he looks it. A well kept 42 year old man, but for the amount of effort he puts in, it's not even shocking. Like, yeah you dye your hair and you kept in shape but... Looking "beautiful" is your life now. I'm not bowled over by the results.
His face looks far more youthful than that of 99.9% of 42 year old men. However, that is superficial.
Additionally, he touts fitness comparable or superior to that of an 18 year old, but he takes TRT...
And estrogen, he looks like an old woman.
Nah not especially youthful. You can't hide the thinning of the skin around the eyes and temples. Dead giveaway
Besides, most 42 year olds have young children and work. He doesn't have either.
And "fitness of an 18 year old" is meaningless. What kind of 18 year old? An athlete? An untrained one? Huge variation
>Besides, most 42 year olds have young children and work. He doesn't have either.
This is just awful cope.
He has three kids. And the whole reason he's doing this is because he became a multimillionaire by being a successful entrepreneur.
And now he doesn't have to do shit, so?
Oh, wait. Nevermind. Your argument was that "normal" 42yo men look old and haggard because they have to wageslave and change diapers? That's a pretty bad argument too.
Agreed. Not that impressive. He is in shape and all, but it's not like you can't tell his age, just a well kept 42 yo. If he was 70 and looked like that, I'd be impressed. He is just doing this for the headlines and people are giving that attention to him. If he quits a few months from now, no one will care.
His argument makes sense, it's not that the guy will gain extra wrinkles for it, but if you are wageslave changing diapers you don't have that much time or money to do skin care everyday and whatever else he does.
>he touts fitness comparable or superior to that of an 18 year old
dogshit metric, that ain't hard to do...
L M A O !!!!!!!11111 ONE(1) PL87
He's in the top 1.5% percent cardio-wise. That's impressive.
I've seen Asians in their 50s that look younger than this guy
Bryan does look old, but I hope he makes it
fuck I love being young
His face is some uncanny valley android-like nightmare fuel...
He's 46 now, and there's no denying that he looks great for his age, but you're right, he basically looks how you'd expect a rich person who obsesses over their own self-care to look. I'm curious to know how this guy will look in 10-15 years. By then it should be obvious if he's actually slowed his aging down or not
>there's no denying that he looks great for his age
Hahahha what
Anon should have clarified: there's no denying it as long you're actually being serious and not trying to larp as le epic contrarian SwoleShackner
Lol he looks like a fucking retarded vampire when you see close-up images of him. His face and skin are deeply unsettling
Retarded vampire you say?
>Looking "beautiful" is your life now. I'm not bowled over by the results.
I think it seems vain when you think of him doing it just for himself but he is actually conducting genuine research using himself and testing what the processes of aging are
there's a lot worse hobbies
>genuine research
>n=1
lmao imagine believing this narcissistic billionaire isn't doing it for vanity
Every thread we have to explain to retards like you that he is trying to de-age himself physiologically. So his bloods show up like a young man's. It's not fucking hard to follow you ugly idiot.
calm down bryan, rageposting ages you
His protocol is unironically beginning to work. He looks like he's in his mid 30s.
his sons started this in their teens, interested to see what theyre gonna look like in 10 years
If you showed this to a girl who doesnt know him and say he is 30, she would believe it
So all I have to do to get a girl to think I'm slightly younger is drink blood and spend millions of dollars and every hour of the day devoted to my skincare routine?
I tried this on my gf and it didn't work
your left hand doesnt count
holy smokes that's hilarious
>SpongeBob music
>bbbbbrap
I am the same age as him and have better skin. He looks his age. The difference is unlike him I don't have health problems because I'm not stuffing my mouth with man-made foods and pills every day.
damn, special agent Dale Cooper looks like THAT?
>This is a 72 year old man. What's your excuse
I haven't been injecting my children's blood :/
rip your gains
reported for posting a naked underage boy
I report these and hopefully it makes a janny lol. I do it for free
>a 72 year old man
Yeah we can tell
Actually looks good here. More fit than I expected him to be.
Who knows, maybe his plan is finally begining to show results.
he said girls slide into his DMs all the time. Antiagemaxxing is the final pill we all have to swallow
There have been videos where he showed his skin care regimen and he was basically just using red light therapy and over-the-counter products that millions of normies are using. The problem is that his "protocol" includes a million different things, and it's hard to tell what's actually useful and which things are a waste of time/money
You should already start with sunscreen and vitamin D supplements, maybe metformin/berberine as well
>Girls are attracted to millionaires
color me shocked
Billionaires*
he is literally the meme of 6 foot jacked rich man
Source? This guy looks like an uncanny valley vampire in his videos and pictures, no way is he pulling chicks
wtf he's 72? he looks like an infant!
This guys protocol is so retarded lol, he tries to increase serotonin and tries to lower his body temperature as much as possible
He's literally the antipeater.
He obviously follows David Sinclair's anti-aging stuff ... including Dave's affinity for plastic surgery and makeup.
peatcel mad
Hiding behind that teenager?
>46
>Rich as fuck
>Nothing to do,
>but too old to risk seriously harming yourself
>"I know!"
>"I'll spend my riches on skincare and megaphones so everyone will give me attention!"
Oh, a woman, of course.
Excuse for what, being born in 1987?
he mogs 95% of SwoleShack, sad!
Does he have an onlyfans? I want to see him doing the yoruichi pose
I mean, he looks about as old as David Beckham despite actually being several years younger.
Beckham spends millions on his appearance too
It's not working. He looks like a 70 year old who dyes his hair and takes steroids.
In some of his pics you can even see he's got those mrsa sores that old folks get in low-cost nursing homes.
I know manual laborers in their 60s who spend their free time smoking cigars and riding motorcycles with no shirt on that look more youthful than this bloke.
I believe that BJ may FEEL young, but he does not LOOK young.
His diet was stupid as fuck, He was on caloric deficit year around.
That stealing blood from your children is straight up fucking evil.
>stop posting children
OP you deserve the rope...
Will skin ever be able to return to youthful levels in our lifetimes?
I'm not 72.
going on in Thailand, sponsored by a Thai billionaire. Here is what they are doing:
>first they selected bunch of healthy 18-20 year old male teenagers with good skeletal and mental development and no bad habits
>tested them for broad range of health/aging markers
This is supposed to be the gold standard of human health, what they aim to achieve or get closer to.
>then they selected 48 men aged between 50-60 in good health, low-average bodyfat
>all live in a sanatorium (no other patients)
>split into 5 groups (one small control group) and given different diets and supplements
>doctors regularly take blood/piss/shit test and monitor their progress across huge number of biomarkers
>gradually decrease/eliminate foods/supplements that have statistically negative effects
>gradually increase foods/supplements that have positive effects
The first stage is supposed to be finding the optimal diet and vitamin/mineral intake. After this established they will continue by testing different supplements to conquer aging. The whole experiment is going on for 14 months now and they are getting somewhat close to finding the perfect diet. All subjects are healthy, happy and except control group, feel much better. So far only one subject was kicked out of the program because he got caught bringing alcohol from outside at night. Initially they followed different exercise regimens, but in the first six months they found optimal exercise routine and now all subjects follow the same program.
The whole experiment is extremely well organized and well funded. This place has amazing gym, swimming pool, huge park and the food is here is of highest quality. Olive oil smells amazing and even potatoes tastes different. Nurses, chiefs, coaches cater to every need subjects can have. Doctor in charge is a mad scientist from Korea and another Thai doctor helping him. Will continue below.
>but in the first six months they found optimal exercise routine and now all subjects follow the same program.
Which is?
The optimal exercise routine was "found" before I joined in. It might not be perfect, but it is optimal in a sense that any further changes don't yield significant health improvements. So here is the routine:
>very basic upper/lower split once a week (monday/wednesday)
>monday squats 3x5 and leg curls 3x8
>wednesday bp 3x5, one arm press 3x8, pendlay row 3x5, face pull 3x8
>both done at 11am - 12am, followed by a lunch
>solid cardio (running, swimming or cycling) session at 7pm, where subjects need to burn 400-500 calories
>subjects need to do 20k steps during the day
continue... diet.
It's found that the best is to it twice a day, but timing doesn't really matter. Breakfast - lunch, breakfast - dinner, lunch - dinner all equally good. When I joined some of subjects were eating lunch-dinner and some breakfast - lunch, but now everybody switched to lunch - dinner. Subjects prefer to wake up and go for a long walk, because they need get in 20k steps. They are still playing with diet among several groups, but it's progressively shaping into what it seems to be a perfect diet in some groups. It's high in protein, high in fat and moderate in carbs. White rice, white bread and processed food were eliminated from the very beginning as they were assumed to be bad. Diets in some groups are getting very interesting because they have somewhat dry main dishes and ridiculously oily salads with chunks of beef tallow. Some even drink molten butter. Anyway, here what we have at this point:
>all grains, potatoes, cassava, wheat products(bread, pasta....) are bad
the best of grains are barley and oats, but even they seem to have negative effects on biomarkers. All of these are completely eliminated at this point, but couple groups are still eating various beans. Carbs come from vegetables like cabbage, broccoli, broccoli sprouts, brussels sprouts, carrots, pumpkins, tomatoes... Foods are fried without oil (using small amounts of bone broth)
>all sorts of cheese are terrible
raw goat cheese is the least bad cheese, but still shouldn't be consumed
>all dairy is bad in general
kefir and whole yoghurt have positive effects if diet is deficient in protein and K2, otherwise they are net negative too
>all seed oils are bad
only uncooked extra virgin olive oil in salads is good.
>all nuts and seeds should be avoided
they only use crushed flaxseeds and chia seeds in salads
continue below...
continue...
>pork, beef, horse meat, lamb and goat all not healthy
>Some types of fish: salmon, sardines, herring and mackerel are healthy
>Chicken, duck, quail, goose and other birds are neutral
>all shellfish are slightly negative
Basically, the meals here are becoming like this: large portion of vegetables with ton of fish covered with molten butter, plus large bowl of oily salad, either with tallow chunks or olive oil or both. Twice a day. Some groups are also taking protein supplement of 20g of gelatin + 20g of whey protein. And some groups are eating small piece of liver almost every day. Continue...
2 hours later... are you gonna continue or leave me with blue balls?
I'm back. I forgot few things in my previous posts about diet. All groups eat at least one egg a day and some groups eat 4-5 eggs every day. They put a lot of garlic in salads and recently they started putting nutritional yeast in all salads. I'm writing from top of my head what I observed and know from others working here, I don't have protocols.
I'm not sure if anything will be published ever. The whole thing is sponsored by a Thai billionaire who wants to find a solution for aging. He doesn't care about publishing or earning money.
>all dairy is bad
>cover your food in butter
?
that nagger is obviously larping he just got tired of tryig
damn, that sounds grim
post link to article or something, i want to read more
what exactly are they trying to find out?
these people already have good genetics and maybe lifestyle choices. so why not study these choices? and not just their choices, but their parents' and grandparents' choices?
instead they stick them in a jail and force them to live the way they want them to live. i mean, these people already have good genes, so even a couple years of bad habits won't reverse all of that. especially the 18 year olds. so with good food and carefree lifestyle, they can go on indefinitely. but that's not what we're trying to find out. but how did they get there in the first place. what do they do that make them have "good skeletal and mental development"? what do the 50 year old do that make them be in good health and have low bodyfat?
and why did they choose these kind of activities for the participants? i mean all they're doing is walk 20k steps and do a bit of exercises. who gets to live a life like this? why don't they have them do something to test their mental abilities? why didn't they find a mathematician or a musician and ask them what they eat and how they live? or if they are purely concerned with long life, why not find some healthy 90 year olds and talk to them? it just seems very superficial.
>White rice, white bread and processed food were eliminated from the very beginning as they were assumed to be bad
stupid assumption. why is "processed food" lump in together with white rice and white bread?
the rest of the post is too lacking in details to reply to. i dont know what they found out how each food effected what measurement.
>who gets to live a life like this?
A large chunk of retirees who have savings can live like this.
a large chunks of retirees lift weights, walk 20k steps, and do cardio on top of that? are you nuts?
No, stop moving goal posts. What I wrote was very simple. A large portion of retirees have the savings and leisure time to be able to live that kind of a lifestyle if they so chose.
The rhetorical question was "who gets to live a life like this?"
Well, lots of people get to, actually. That doesn't mean they do.
>Well, lots of people get to, actually. That doesn't mean they do.
ok so what's the point? in case you are an autist who doesnt understand the bigger scope of the question, answering the question in a literal sense serves no purpose if you can't get them to live like that. whether or not they can is immaterial.
20k steps is 3 hours of walking. it's hard enough getting people to walk 30 minutes everyday nevermind 3 hours. to get people to walk for 3 hours plus lifting plus extra cardio, is literally impossible.
They are to solve aging in a honest way. The plan is to do it step by step
>Find optimal exercise routine (done)
>Find optimal diet
>Find optimal daily intake of vitamins and minerals
>Test various medicines to reverse aging
The idea is that even if you are healthy and have good diet, exercise routine and take all necessary vitamins and minerals you still will continue aging. However, if you are not healthy, like if you have cancer or obesity, it will interfere with anti-aging treatment and will make it more difficult to establish what exactly works.
18 year olds are not kept here, they were just tested in the beginning to establish a high benchmark for health biomarkers.
>why is "processed food" lump in together with white rice and white bread?
by processed food I mean junk like chips and chocolate bars. I also don't know exactly how they establish which food has positive/negative effects, but I know that they are tweaking their diets and taking tests regularly for biomarkers, so I'm sure they are figuring it out what improves health and what doesn't.
>the rest of the post is too lacking in details
correct, because I'm not a doctor here and I don't have access to all data. By the way putting 20k hands is not difficult, they subjects here usually done with it by 11 am and most walk 25k+ steps by the end of the day easily.
Thanks for these posts. I appericiate them.
A few questions:
Do they eat fruits? How much fruits do they eat? Do the doctors consider fruits good or bad?
Do the participants just eat till satiated or do they have a set calories that they can eat based on maybe height and weight?
Same with macros. Do they just eat whatever they want (from the available "good" food) or does their food get measured for strict macro split? And if so, whats the ratio of carb/fat/protein?
What was the original 5 groups and what was the difference between the groups?
Why did they get rid of the 5 groups and have everybody follow the same protocal?
What are the biomarkers that they measure?
How did they come to the conclusion that the current exercise program is optimal?
Are the participants all Thai or are there other ethnicity?
How long do they plan on running this program?
I know its a lot of questions! I hope you find the time to answer them. Thanks.
1. During meal time all of them have access to some fruits like avocado, blueberry, durian... but not really forced to eat. I know that 1 group is required to eat pineapple from time to time. Overall I would say they eat very little fruits.
2. All participants have minimum requirements of 1 main dish and 1 salad in every meal. Once they finish both, they can eat more of either or both or some veggies/fruits available to them as much as they want. Nurses keep record of what they eat. Foods are very oily, so they don't a lot. No snacks between meals.
3. We still have same five groups, but their diets are converging and becoming similar. Initially some of them were eating once a day, some twice and some three times a day. Now all of them eating twice a day, lunch-dinner (though this their own choice). Also initially only one group wasn't eating grains, but gradually all groups dropped grains and potatoes. Although some groups are still eating beans. They still eat a lot of vegetables, so it's not keto diet by any means.
4. I don't know exactly what biomarkers they measure.
5. The exercises were already set when I arrived to replace one of workers here. I imagine they tweaked exercises until they stopped seeing improvements.
6. All participants are Thai.
7. I don't know for sure but I have verbal agreement to work at least two more years. It might continue for longer though. I don't think there is a time/money limit. My impression is that they are dead set on solving aging completely. They are slowly adding more supplements. Once they pinpoint diet I'm sure they will start playing with supplements more aggressively.
would love to keep track of these studies. Is there any way?
Not yet. Maybe in couple years they will publish something, maybe not.
continue...
Minerals and vitamins. These are not very clear yet, but from what I know few things are determined. For example they used to give large doses, 10g+, of vitamin C, but now almost all subjects take 3g of vitamin C daily, spread across the day. They also take large doses of vitamin K2(mix of Mk4 and MK7) and large dose of vitamin D3 (50k - 100k iu) once a week. Some groups are taking vitamin B complex.
>bad minerals: iron, copper
>good minerals: magnesium, selenium, iodine
few other things that happened recently. Subjects were free to drink coffee or tea until recently, but then they suddenly completely removed both of them. Now subjects drink only water(with the exception of protein drink), but they didn't even notice the change. Nobody complained. Also just recently all groups started taking either tudca or Ox bile, but I don't know if it will continue or not. Also, they stopped doing cryotherapy, I think it doesn't make a difference. Most of the groups are still doing sauna 2-4 times a week.
he's looking more defined than before, less raw chicken look, but maybe he's just better at taking pictures
Just a bit disappointing he's a vegan. I would love see him eating wild duck, boar, deer. Let him do the wildest fucking things even if it's ethically repulsive. Start eating aborted embryo's and drink mommy's milk motherfucker. Go beyond reason and grasp immortality by the balls.
this guy has some kind of womanish look maybe its his skin texture. its like womans skin on mans face
Notice he capitalizes Him
Somebody needs to basedjack this wanker
his facial expression looks like the G-man from half life
Seems gay tbh. Trying to keep some kind of "boyish" aesthetic well into your 40s is very homosexual. Men don't need to be never-wipe-my-ass disgusting or not have a skin routine, but age will generally effect men favorably.
His anti aging protocol costs him $2,000,000 a year and all it does is make him a 46 year old man that looks like an uncanny 30-something year old.
He probably has baby-faced genes to begin with, so my guess is he's just a living billboard used to sell expensive treatments to the desperate, vain, non-genetically-gifted consumers.
Same anon
It also perplexes me that he spends so much money, time, and effort on his face and yet hasn't done any beauty-work on his teeth
What's the shit he's really doing? There's no way he's telling people the actual peptides and drugs he's taking. He just tells goyim he's using red light therapy etc.
https://protocol.bryanjohnson.com/#bryan-johnsons-blueprint
He's only been doing this for 5ish years, before that he was a fat slob. As another commenter said, it'll take 10 years we'll see if he can visibly reduce ageing
No idea why people get so triggered by this guy. Also how everyone on the internet think this guy looks so old but totally still get carded at 30 and everyone asks if they’re in their early 20s. I personally think it’s cool he’s serving as a test dummy free from the normal constraints of conducting a sanctioned scientific experiment. Really curious to see if the younger blood donations actually does something
>triggered
People who are extremely online can detect a grifter when they see one. I respect what he's doing, but at the same time I can clearly see his obvious grift: he has spent a LOT of money promoting himself online. You think Jesse James West, Will Tennyson, various other youtubers and sundry news networks just randomly decided to make videos on the guy? Of course not. Johnson is paying to be promoted. It's also clear that despite his superficial altruism his end goal is to monetize what he is doing: the first step appears to be by selling a branded olive oil. Someone made a video about this estimating Johnson's olive oil business has the potential to be worth ~$50 million.
Anyway, I'm certainly not denying his protocol may be effective, and I will keep an open mind and test some of these supplements and strategies out for myself.
orthodox church.
>40 years old
>cheat lighting
Lol, go look at any footage of him, dude's fucking skeletql and just does cardio all day while gobbling 150 different pills, it's peak mental illness
As a small babyfaced twink feels good mogging all these silicon valley nerds with much less effort
someone should photoshop this
I would but I'm too lazy rn
maybe once I finish my coffee
he eats only veggies and had fat injections done on his face.
he lost me. he should reevaluate his approach and fire some of the scamming israelite docs he employs
he does many things good and the only one the make most of his research public but the extreme low bf, the plastic surgeries, the idiotic diet and too much exercise is against the spirit of longevity.
my excuse is not having adrenochrome on standby, there's no fucking way that man is 72
Brad Pitt looked like this at 46 and he drank and smoked AND had to deal with a fucking crazy bitch like Angelina Jolie. No comparison.
they do hialuronic acid and other face injections before shooting. this shit makes you look 15 years younger but only for a week or two.
I can't afford adrenochrome
Past a certain age, trying to look young backfires for men. You can see this in Tom Cruise vs Brad Pitt. Cruise is 60+ yo, but tries to look decades younger: disgusting. Pitt looks great, but nobody will say that he's younger than 45 or even 50.
If you zoom in on his face, he looks like a bull dyke
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODDDSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This guy is going to get steroids legalized
Once he proves that injecting exogenous hormones is just a small but important part of your everyday skincare routine, you'll be able to buy test off the shelf in the beauty aisle at Walmart.
He's actually slowly starting to look a bit younger. Why are you guys so against the idea of de-aging yourself and living for hundreds of years?
I'm not 72