maybe he believes both sides killing eachother is good ot he just doesn't like sandnaggers all of which are valid viewpoints as long as you aren't a shitskin
after vaxx disaster humanity wont get more reta-
I really don't get the vaxx thing. vaccines have existed since 1796. what changed? can someone explain pls
Vaccines before COVID were MLVs and similar. Either weakened living viruses or dead ones, created in order to train the white blood cells on that virus.
The COVID shots are mRNA shots that alter the RNA (parallel to DNA) of the recipient and were not tested before they were released. There is massive censorship of any discussion about any inconvenient facts about it and there was an immense pressure on people to take it. All this to protect us from a virus that was made in a Chinese lab, and that Fauci gave taxpayer money to fund research on, especially how it can be made to have additional function. And a virus that didn't kill the oldest living person in the world: Lucile Randon, a french nun born in 1904. She got it in early 2021 and died in late 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucile_Randon
Actual vaccines prevent you from getting whatever you're vaccinated against. The COVID 'vaccine' doesn't prevent you from getting COVID (or transmitting it either) so it's more like a shot
NTA, but the fact is that there is no real answer to the problems regarding the vaccine, and any questioning about the efficacy or consequences of it is framed as being insane. This wouldn't be the first case of medical malpractice and you don't care because you are a retard
>Explaining the problem using basic, uncontroversial facts that have been confirmed, even by MSM (even if they've gotten into the habit of gaslighting us on every bloody thing now) >"WTF Schizo absolute paranoid lunatic kys"
NTA, but the fact is that there is no real answer to the problems regarding the vaccine, and any questioning about the efficacy or consequences of it is framed as being insane. This wouldn't be the first case of medical malpractice and you don't care because you are a retard
>The COVID shots are mRNA shots that alter the RNA (parallel to DNA) of the recipient
You say this like it's actually altering the person's genetic code. mRNA, messenger RNA, is laterally just the biochemical instructions for telling your cells to make certain proteins. There's no RNA "to alter" because RNA is transcribed from DNA.
None of what I just said matters, though, because you're a schizophrenic conspiracist arguing in bad faith.
>alter the RNA
RNA has a short as fuck half life, doubly so if it's getting translated
guess how a virus makes the proteins it needs to replicate when you're infected
It's supposed to have a short half life but vaccine MRNA was found to linger in brain tissues for weeks after vaccination. How long they possibly could we don't know because the study was ended after 8 weeks IIRC
man, I hope AI will become so incredibly powerful that I can come home from work and tell sexlexa to generate a new episode of seinfeld instantly every single day
it doesn't alter RNA, it is RNA which is just a sequence of genes copied from DNA that instructs cells on how to build proteins. It literally just uses your body to assemble the spikes instead of assembling them outside the body and then injecting them. Once the RNA has broken down, it's not going to be assembling any more spikes.
>It literally just uses your body to assemble the spikes instead of assembling them outside the body and then injecting them. >use your body as a spike factory, which is the toxic thing about covid
this was the argument I made to normies about why it was a bad idea, idiots
Actual vaccines prevent you from getting whatever you're vaccinated against. The COVID 'vaccine' doesn't prevent you from getting COVID (or transmitting it either) so it's more like a shot
>Actual vaccines prevent you from getting whatever you're vaccinated against.
You shouldn't speak on subjects you're unfamiliar with, you Dunning-Kruger recipient.
No vaccine is 100% effective. Literally zero. Some are certainly extremely effective, like two polio vaccine doses are 90% effective. Conversely the flu vaccine is even less effective than COVID vaccines (far less, actually). Similarly, most vaccines also require boosters periodically to stay effective, while others do not (most notably MMR).
Measles is on the other end of the spectrum as the flu or COVID. Measles is an extremely stable virus, hence why you can acquire a lifelong immunity from the MMR vaccine. Conversely, viruses that constantly mutate will also need constantly updated vaccines.
>The covid vaccine is 100% effective. You might disagree. You might even have some evidence to the contrary. But you have to ask yourself: is this really worth losing my job over? The covid vaccine is 100% effective.
These are just the excuses you've been fed. They said, at first, that it would just be one. Then two. Then "we may have to do 3". The thing is, it makes you MORE susceptible to the virus. It literally has NO upside.
>what changed?
no drug is perfectly free of side effects. generally you shouldn't use them without a good reason, where the benefit outweighs the risk. covid simply was not dangerous for most of us, but the begging for the government to take your right to refuse medication absolutely was dangerous.
>what changed?
the top scientific minds congregated on facebook and shared top-secret info banned by the government in the form of infographs and charts.
>what changed?
no drug is perfectly free of side effects. generally you shouldn't use them without a good reason, where the benefit outweighs the risk. covid simply was not dangerous for most of us, but the begging for the government to take your right to refuse medication absolutely was dangerous.
Actual vaccines prevent you from getting whatever you're vaccinated against. The COVID 'vaccine' doesn't prevent you from getting COVID (or transmitting it either) so it's more like a shot
Vaccines before COVID were MLVs and similar. Either weakened living viruses or dead ones, created in order to train the white blood cells on that virus.
The COVID shots are mRNA shots that alter the RNA (parallel to DNA) of the recipient and were not tested before they were released. There is massive censorship of any discussion about any inconvenient facts about it and there was an immense pressure on people to take it. All this to protect us from a virus that was made in a Chinese lab, and that Fauci gave taxpayer money to fund research on, especially how it can be made to have additional function. And a virus that didn't kill the oldest living person in the world: Lucile Randon, a french nun born in 1904. She got it in early 2021 and died in late 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucile_Randon
Not every vaccine is the same
explain the exact mechanism, in detail, by which any COVID vaccine does any kind of harm to the human body.
go ahead professor, explain exactly how the vaccine harms the human body. no vague, broad statements now! tell us exactly what happens when the vaccine enters the bloodstream. give us a step-by-step breakdown. this should be easy for someone as educated on the vax as you are.
>She lost 16kg (35lbs) on Ozempic and then Saxenda over five months — while suffering from constant nausea, vomiting and diarrhea.
She had constant vomiting and nausea for 5 months and didnt stop lol
Some people are just retarded
Whats mental is 5 months to lose 16kg, I've lost 11kg in a 2 month cut by just eating less fucking food. All these schizos who needs drugs, fad diets and insane fasting techniques are actually mental. Just eat less food.
why are SwoleShack anons trying to discourage fats from losing weight at any cost
it doesn't hurt SwoleShack people and just makes the general population slimmer
>at any cost
The cost was her life, anon. She's going to lose all the weight because she's decomposing.
She could have just eaten a little less than normal.
People are killing themselves with pharma injections when they could just quit carbs.
It's insane. It's like the covid mRNA jabs all over again. Unnecessary injections with terrible consequences.
retards, the people taking these drugs WILL NEVER lose the weight naturally. you're arguing in favor of keeping more fat people around because they MIGHT die to a drug.
no matter what they will not willingly eat less, so there is zero harm in us letting them take these drugs. the only alternative is for us to let them stay fat forever.
yes they literally would rather potentially DIE than stop eating. their choice, its zero cost to us.
>They would for sure lose weight if government stopped lying.
retarded, what in gods name makes you think that even when confronted with the absolute truth, that fats would find willpower in their hearts to stop eating so much
these people look in the mirror every day and see the results plain to their eyes and do not change, a government statement would not change their mind.
Everyone was skinny in the past. Before the calorie psyop.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Everyone was skinny in the past. Before the calorie psyop.
yeah, in the past. the western man of 1950 is not the same western man of 2020
let the fats take the drugs. it literally does nothing to hurt us, and makes it so we have to see less fat people.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>we did it we cured obesity! >just like we cured covid
Is there anything pharma can't fix?
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
there is no similarity between the two, nobody is claiming to cure obesity, we are just treating the symptom (disgusting fat people everywhere)
would anyone argue that someone who takes this drug will not lose weight over time? and who cares about the side effects, we are not the losers who take it.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Yeah back when they smoked, snorted coke, and didn't spend all day indoors. You saved all these images yet can't do basic critical thinking for yourself.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
foods were likely less calorie dense in the past. people were likely more active in the past.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
People in the past ate butter. Fear of 'calorie dense' fat is modern.
>retards, the people taking these drugs WILL NEVER lose the weight naturally.
Bullshit, you don't know that. Sure, a majority of people won't ever do it, but a sizeable minority of once-fat people HAVE lost the weight and kept it off for good.
Now some of those people who otherwise could/would have lost the weight naturally are going to skip over that option and go straight for the shortcut method because people shill it as being great and they don't realize the shortcut is mortally dangerous and completely inferior to natural weight loss
>their choice, its zero cost to us.
Only the most retarded people think this. It doesn't matter what country you're from, fat people raise the overall cost of healthcare. Universal health care? Where do you think your tax dollars are going? The fat people. US healthcare? All those government subsidies are again going to fat people, and again come from taxes.
The problem has always been eating too much and the solution is still don't eat too much >Ozempic is potentially dangerous medication that could kill people, but it's worth taking because it does this one thing impossible without drugs (stop eating too much)
Processed foods which are rich in carbs tend to be calorie-dense and nutritionally vapid.
I'm sure that when this guy tells fatties to cut the sugar/carbs, he's talking about doritos and ice cream. Not fresh fruit and vegetables
No it doesn't, a single 12oz can contains 140 empty calories. Drinking calories is always a bad idea when those calories come from added sugars and thus provide no nutritional value. Milk has similar caloric content but it provides nutrients in the form of protein, calcium, and vitamin D so it doesn't purely serve to make you fat like coca-cola does
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Milk has similar caloric content
Milk has 50% more calories, retard.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
well he could have meant 1%.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>remove the part that makes milk calorie dense >"Wow you see guys milk isn't calorie dense at all!!"
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Sorry anon but anyone who drinks whole milk is retarded, it's more like a cream than a beverage
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>my sugar water is real milk!!
You're an idiot.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
I mean, human milk has an even higher sugar to fat ratio than 1%
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>retarded whataboutism
Did you know that they have to add artificial vitamins into reduced fat and skim milk because you remove them when you process it to remove the milk fat. >but muh heckin processed artificial milk!!!
Dumbass.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>retarded whataboutism
???
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>But what about human milk?
Whataboutism. 85 IQ retard. Maybe you need to stop drinking artificial milk, it's damaging your brain.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
If human milk composition is irrelevant to human nutrition I don't know what could possibly be on topic, so you're either disingenuous or profoundly retarded - I assume the former
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
That's not the topic. You pulled a whataboutism because you're a homosexual and got btfo.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
I guess it's the latter
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
have a nice day.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>just as much protein, vitamin and nutritional content with fewer calories and doesn't have the consistency of a thick cream
Yeah skim milk is just better in every single way, sorry
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
No skim milk is for dick sucking homosexuals. The 60 extra calories per 8oz you save vs drinking whole milk is not worth the massive loss in taste. If you can't spare the extra calories or you're afraid of fat you need to rethink your diet
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
lol dumbass, "but it tastes better!" is literally the mantra of fatties everywhere as they justify their shitty diets.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>he doesn't like water
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
They have to add artificial vitamins to skim milk dumbass, they get removed when they remove the milk fat.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
They add artificial vitamins to whole milk as well, it's required by law
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
FACT: only fatties drink skim milk
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>drinking anything but whole milk
I don't understand how anyone can willingly drink skim or 2% milk. That shit doesn't even taste like milk, it's just cloudy water. I grew up drinking that garbage and I won't ever go back. Hell, I even pay extra for the raw milk with cream on top now.
>why are SwoleShack anons trying to discourage fats from losing weight at any cost
There should be a clear visible distinction between high a low time preference individuals. I say this as an overweight person.
I find it horrifying that Americans are poisoned by the food industry putting seed oils in food, and the answer to this is to buy a drug from a different American industry
It doesn't teach your discipline.
It doesn't make you change your eating habits, or seek help for healing the mental trauma causing you to over eat.
There are already plenty of adverse effects coming into light. One of them is that you need to stay on the drug for the rest of your life, as your body stops producing the hormone the drugs imitates.
It's good for investors, though. For now.
there are people who seriously think being fit is a competition and want other people to fail. These are the same people that think using steroids outside of competitive sports is somehow cheating
I am against people doing shit the lazy way because they won't keep it off, but I'd bet money this isn't the drugs fault. Its a peptide, its not crazy shit.
The drug slows gastric emptying. The disorder itself, which you can be left with because of taking the drug, carries an estimated mortality rate of 33% at 5 years
>fatties eat carbs therefore carbs = bad
Fatties eat absolutely everything under the sun.
Carbs are good for fueling workouts. I doubt any of you ketofags even lift because you think your meme diet is magically going to make you ripped without any actual effort
So you're approaching it from the standpoint of a lifelong obese lard trying to cut down to a normal weight for the first time in your life, and not from that of an already relatively fit person trying to reach peak physical condition
I reiterate, people who actually reach peak physical shape (NOT just a normalfag skinny/skinnyfat build) tend not to follow keto
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>people who actually reach peak physical shape
post physique
>cherry picking a fat guy and branding him as the anthitesis. >unlimited carbs >posting a single picture of someone who, by definition of how muscle is created, is not sedentary and caliming it is >the chad vs virgin meme format >0 actual arguments, links etc. >the filename indicating its a part of a spam collection
Even a schizo info dump is much more trustworthy than this
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
It's not cherry picking. It's Anon vs. Anon.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Everyone was skinny in the past. It has nothing to do with American lifestyle and HFCS.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Its retard vs retard
Wtf i love keto now
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>/FAT/ Weightloss General
[...]
>happy new year, /fat/. heres to another 100 pounds lost in this coming year. 150 down already, but still so much to go.
At least use examples of people not trying to lose weight.
>/FAT/ Weightloss General
[...] >happy new year, /fat/. heres to another 100 pounds lost in this coming year. 150 down already, but still so much to go.
At least use examples of people not trying to lose weight.
You are confused.
These are image comparisons showing people from the /fat/ thread. Different diets yield different results.
I genuinely don't understand how people can't lose weight. I'm down 8kg in 7 or 8 weeks by occasionally skipping lunch, not eating biscuits and jelly snakes and switching to skim milk. Admittedly i wasnt fat in the first place, I'm just cutting for a weight division.
>eat more calories >lose more weight
Oh no calorie bros how is this possible?
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Both experimental diets were designed to be hypoenergetic (-500 kcal/day)
So they were eating at a calorie deficit. CICO wins again idiot.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Isocaloric, yet one is superior? How do you explain that without debunking the whole anti-keto mantra?(or sounding mad?)
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
You lose more water weight on Keto. It's why you idiots fall in love with it so much. If they did the study for a month or two longer the weight loss would even out.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
the study said they lost more fat mass on a low-carb diet, not just total body weight.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
nagger IQ
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
The low-carb men lost the most lean mass.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
water
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
I wonder if this takes into account that very low carb kills your glycogen - meaning your muscles will recover that mass quickly. Seems like this may suggest a high amount of muscle loss, when that isn't really the case.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>very low carb kills your glycogen - meaning your muscles will recover that mass quickly
No it doesn't señor retard
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
yes it does, less energy is stored as sugar in the muscles, causing them to loose their water, youd know this if youve ever dieted, you lose a large amount of weight right at the start, thats water!
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
This isn't because carbs make you fat, its because low fat diets suck for vitamins and minerals. Shit like carnivore works because meat is nutritionally dense. That's the important part. Lifting on no sugar sucks once you start getting older if you still do high intensity.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Carbs are no problem if you use them, and gluconeogenesis is just not very efficient. I couldn't keep up with lifting on keto, even as a noob, and I was inadvertently eating 4000-6000 calories a day, which is just atrocious.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Lifting on zerocarb is fine. You're just an addict.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Baker takes it easy though. Who the fuck does dl in sets of 15.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
omg he did ... ahh .... ohhhh... 20 singles trap bar rack pulls, huwhy? all he had to do is stand on a step (because of retard setup but ok) and do not drop the bar, he would get 3 reps maybe 4
old people should avoid retard gimmicks in gym
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>he would get 3 reps maybe 4
did i mention that u don't stand up fully also? that is if u want to achieve time under tension, if ya just want to "lift heavy" on the other hand - go ahead and do your many-o-singles xD
>who the fuck doesn't stand fully up while training deadlifts?
eddie hall for example, anything else bot?
2200 is undereating, people just eat garbage is the problem.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>2200 is undereating
Ask me how I know you're a total fatfuck.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Good question since I'm 145 lbs. I was 300 in the past though.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Lmao. 2200 is a bulk for you, little guy.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
If it were I wouldn't have said it, since I actually know wth I'm talking about.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Lol. Your BMR is like 1,600.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Let he who is without DYEL cast the first stone.
Post fizeek and stats or your BMR is 1000.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
My BMR is 1000. I'm actually a 4'5" 80lb vietnamese.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
My condolences.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
I'm an early intermediate lifter currently just trying to get out of a recovery hole and heal an injury, so I'm on sedentary maintenance calories. 2160. Just for sitting around doing nothing, walking about as you normally do. If I train, my maintenance is nearly 2800, and it was higher before I got injured since I can't train my legs at the moment, so I lost a lot of lean mass there.
If you're in a surplus on 2200 you're either not lifting or you're an absolute twig. A chubby but strong guy actually making gains is way cooler than a skinny twink who is obsessed with maintaining his tiny and lean physique forever. Learn to plan for the future.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>w-well it's undereating if you're lifting and doing cardio!!
Epic bro. Next you're gonna tell me 6k calories is actually under eating because Michael Phelps was eating 8k calories a day while swimming for hours a day.
Most people, which is what that chart is referencing, are sedentary.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Gee, I didn't know I was going to recieve such high praise! Cardio? Never. B) Well sure I do some, but I'm not some star athlete. I plan on being one in the future, but I'm just a guy. We're not talking about cutting here, and people who are undermuscled should be bulking when they're not too fatty. Even so, you should lift when you cut, unless you wanna lose tons of gains while losing way less fat. So someone my weight (low 180s) at 30% bodyfat instead would be eating around 2500 calories for maintenance while training, so likely 1700-2000 calories WHILE CUTTING. Imagine that.
You shouldn't go by certain unhealthy standards just because they're the norm. What's the norm is killing people or otherwise depreciating the quality of their lives. It's good to get a lot of nutrients in, to burn more and take in more.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>blah blah blah
You missed my point completely and typed a bunch of garbage. Follow the conversation.
The chart references the average person, who is supposedly eating 2200 calories. The average person is sedentary. Screeching that 2200 is undereating is retarded. >b-but what about exercise
They aren't exercising. >but they should!
That's a different conversation you retard.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Hey, don't call me a retard as if that's somehow a bad thing!
This is my convo and I'll retard it however I want!
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
2200 is undereating for a 5'10 180 male even on bullshit normie calculators.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
No it's not. Also 180lbs at 5' 10" is a BMI of 25.8, which is overweight. A sedentary, low body fat male at 5' 10" won't weigh 180lbs.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Were talking about average americans. If you have a job you'll be in light activity.
Lmao if you really think your average American is only eating 2200 calories per day. Don't know where you pulled those number from but they are not even close to being accurate.
The NHANES survey is widely known to be inaccurate, but USDA data of per capita food availability paints a similar picture; calorie consumption leveled off 10 years ago, while obesity kept right on rising.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
That's horseshit. If you believe it then you're a retard. naggers can't even into Secret Eaters anymore.
Ozempic has really bad side effects and makes your face look shit after taking it. Normies will literally do anything to lose weight other than exercise and eat healthily (or just reduce their goyslop intake at least)
well weight loss isn't as simple as diet and exercise. Not trying to defend fatties, but its not a simple process. It takes a long time and there's other factors other than CICO.
Ozempic has really bad side effects and makes your face look shit after taking it. Normies will literally do anything to lose weight other than exercise and eat healthily (or just reduce their goyslop intake at least)
>63
He lived a full life, some people are just not meant to live longer.
My friend's grandfather died from a heart attack two months into his retirement.
>dies >somehow revealed it was ozempic, even though medical history should be secret >shown she was taking 2 different GLP-1 Drugs at the same time >supposedly started to spit out "brown" stuff from her mouth >no reputable sources
>yeah just another schizo thread.
gee, you fucking think? SwoleShack is literally the worst place to get medical advice outside of the trashy alley in your neighborhood.
This is funny because the traditional Kuwaiti diet which most people eat is like 80% vegetable oil, but some American fast food joints at an American military base get blamed for the entire country being obese
they should tweak the tourism features in Civilization so that you can make other civs retarded and more dependent on you by showering them with fast food and drugs
Civ really would benefit from having more ways to wage indirect warfare. Having a population health mechanic that affects military unit effectiveness and can be attacked through Tourism, expanding the effects of spreading Religion, being able to debase someone's currency and end a golden age prematuely like the US did to Japan. All without even breaking alliances.
Don't care. Still taking Mounjaro. Still down 100lbs effortlessly in 7 months. Zero side effects after 1st month (a bit of nausea for a few hours after injection)
Seethe.
I never kinda get why would you use. Ozempig oink oink fatties grilling some pork barbeque, especially brisket homosexual I will slit their fatty wrists and squat some massive PR. Today baby.
I'm fairly well off. I have about 6 figures liquid in my bank as well as 6 figures in assets not including land. If my future wife ever gets fat, I will personally fund and supply her with all the ozempic in the world
I could literally trick the schizo retards here into drinking urine if I just said the israelite medical company doctors that Biden appointed with the world bank doesn't want you to know
>thinking every homosexual here is on board with your schizo posting.
>Didn't take new designer weightloss drugs for lazy, undisciplined people >Didn't let excess calories enter my mouth >Lost 45kg in a year and a half
It was simply that easy ¯_(ツ)_/¯
And cutting (most) carbs, and all seed oils. I was basically just using this list to make my meals with all my fats coming from meat, tallow or butter, and it worked fantastically. Didn't even have to bother with counting calories, as I would feel full and satiated before it became an issue.
Tirzepatide had been a great tool for cutting but sourcing it forces you to encounter fat old people who cant do math or take zero responsibility for their being fat.
Oh and most of them are facebook users so they have zero care about deanonymizing themselves. Half the discussions start with >DavidVoight76: Hey how do I buy bitcoin to order Tirzepatide from [email protected] with. Also I bought this 10mg vial domestically from scamlabs and reconstituted with 1ml of bac water. How much do I need to inject for a 5mg dose? Thanks, Dave
My mom died of cancer in 1999 and my autistic brother still thinks the doctor killed her. If she died in the last 3 years he would blame a vaccine too.
Nobody in my family is stupid enough to buy a drug just to not stuff their faces all day. Maybe some very distant relative in the US would be stupid enough.
>women dies after taking new drug to lose weight >it's the drug's fault >thousands die after taking new untested vaccine >they didn't die from that!!!!
>died after
did she get hit by a bus?
why wont they say 'died from'? is it cause they're intentionally being misleading without lying and know they can't say died from.
>make your population fat and gaslight them into thinking it's genetics and they can't solve it naturally >make a drug that helps get rid of fat >Lots of fatties take it with no regards for possible side effects
America also has some of the highest insulin prices in the world. They made their population fat and unhealthy and profit so much off of it
It also says mum instead of mom. However, if you're not buying the Novo Nordisk stock and stock of insulin manufacturers, you're leaving money on the table.
>weight loss drug
that site needs to be taken down. it’s not for weight loss as that’s just a side effect, it’s for diabetes. people are fucking taking diabetes drugs without having diabetes and then act surprised when something bad happens.
>surely after vaxx disaster humanity wont get more reta-
What are you a far-right extremist?
First panel, in the middle of the right side of the mask.
amogus
MUGUS
AMBUGUS
ronald
Shame that ‘toss has been simping for Israel lately
Has he really? Pic-related was a comic from a few years ago so he wasn't always like that
maybe he believes both sides killing eachother is good ot he just doesn't like sandnaggers all of which are valid viewpoints as long as you aren't a shitskin
First panel doesn't make sense. That flag is the old gay pride flag, not the trans-inclusive one
I know it's a meme to say this, but I literally don't get it.
I refused the vax but hopped on a cycle
after vaxx disaster humanity wont get more reta-
I really don't get the vaxx thing. vaccines have existed since 1796. what changed? can someone explain pls
Not every vaccine is the same
>what changed?
Retards got internet access.
>t. medicinal chemist
Pseud.
Vaccines before COVID were MLVs and similar. Either weakened living viruses or dead ones, created in order to train the white blood cells on that virus.
The COVID shots are mRNA shots that alter the RNA (parallel to DNA) of the recipient and were not tested before they were released. There is massive censorship of any discussion about any inconvenient facts about it and there was an immense pressure on people to take it. All this to protect us from a virus that was made in a Chinese lab, and that Fauci gave taxpayer money to fund research on, especially how it can be made to have additional function. And a virus that didn't kill the oldest living person in the world: Lucile Randon, a french nun born in 1904. She got it in early 2021 and died in late 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucile_Randon
genuine schizophrenia
NTA, but the fact is that there is no real answer to the problems regarding the vaccine, and any questioning about the efficacy or consequences of it is framed as being insane. This wouldn't be the first case of medical malpractice and you don't care because you are a retard
>Explaining the problem using basic, uncontroversial facts that have been confirmed, even by MSM (even if they've gotten into the habit of gaslighting us on every bloody thing now)
>"WTF Schizo absolute paranoid lunatic kys"
???
I post the frog.
retards
>The COVID shots are mRNA shots that alter the RNA (parallel to DNA) of the recipient
You say this like it's actually altering the person's genetic code. mRNA, messenger RNA, is laterally just the biochemical instructions for telling your cells to make certain proteins. There's no RNA "to alter" because RNA is transcribed from DNA.
None of what I just said matters, though, because you're a schizophrenic conspiracist arguing in bad faith.
>alter the RNA
RNA has a short as fuck half life, doubly so if it's getting translated
guess how a virus makes the proteins it needs to replicate when you're infected
It's supposed to have a short half life but vaccine MRNA was found to linger in brain tissues for weeks after vaccination. How long they possibly could we don't know because the study was ended after 8 weeks IIRC
you might be able to still find some scraps but it sure as shit won't be viable to produce a protein
viruses stay in your body forever
man, I hope AI will become so incredibly powerful that I can come home from work and tell sexlexa to generate a new episode of seinfeld instantly every single day
it doesn't alter RNA, it is RNA which is just a sequence of genes copied from DNA that instructs cells on how to build proteins. It literally just uses your body to assemble the spikes instead of assembling them outside the body and then injecting them. Once the RNA has broken down, it's not going to be assembling any more spikes.
>It literally just uses your body to assemble the spikes instead of assembling them outside the body and then injecting them.
>use your body as a spike factory, which is the toxic thing about covid
this was the argument I made to normies about why it was a bad idea, idiots
Actual vaccines prevent you from getting whatever you're vaccinated against. The COVID 'vaccine' doesn't prevent you from getting COVID (or transmitting it either) so it's more like a shot
>Actual vaccines prevent you from getting whatever you're vaccinated against.
You shouldn't speak on subjects you're unfamiliar with, you Dunning-Kruger recipient.
No vaccine is 100% effective. Literally zero. Some are certainly extremely effective, like two polio vaccine doses are 90% effective. Conversely the flu vaccine is even less effective than COVID vaccines (far less, actually). Similarly, most vaccines also require boosters periodically to stay effective, while others do not (most notably MMR).
Measles is on the other end of the spectrum as the flu or COVID. Measles is an extremely stable virus, hence why you can acquire a lifelong immunity from the MMR vaccine. Conversely, viruses that constantly mutate will also need constantly updated vaccines.
>No vaccine is 100% effective. Literally zero.
That pissed me off when Pfizer said the vaccine for teens is 100% effective and no one questioned it.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/pfizer-says-its-covid-vaccine-100-percent-effective-young-teens-n1262550
>The covid vaccine is 100% effective. You might disagree. You might even have some evidence to the contrary. But you have to ask yourself: is this really worth losing my job over? The covid vaccine is 100% effective.
These are just the excuses you've been fed. They said, at first, that it would just be one. Then two. Then "we may have to do 3". The thing is, it makes you MORE susceptible to the virus. It literally has NO upside.
Those had years of testing done
>what changed?
no drug is perfectly free of side effects. generally you shouldn't use them without a good reason, where the benefit outweighs the risk. covid simply was not dangerous for most of us, but the begging for the government to take your right to refuse medication absolutely was dangerous.
>what changed?
the top scientific minds congregated on facebook and shared top-secret info banned by the government in the form of infographs and charts.
explain the exact mechanism, in detail, by which any COVID vaccine does any kind of harm to the human body.
you won't.
The pseudovaccines are toxic to heart tissue.
https://x.com/thechiefnerd/status/1715752571770462528?
vax cattle lol
not an argument.
go ahead professor, explain exactly how the vaccine harms the human body. no vague, broad statements now! tell us exactly what happens when the vaccine enters the bloodstream. give us a step-by-step breakdown. this should be easy for someone as educated on the vax as you are.
the legal and technical definition of the word "vaccine" changed in 2020
Really? No idea what these people are talking about? You just woke up from a three year coma?
>was taking both Ozempic and Saxenda
>only managed to lose 35lbs
Deserved tbh.
>She lost 16kg (35lbs) on Ozempic and then Saxenda over five months — while suffering from constant nausea, vomiting and diarrhea.
She had constant vomiting and nausea for 5 months and didnt stop lol
Some people are just retarded
Whats mental is 5 months to lose 16kg, I've lost 11kg in a 2 month cut by just eating less fucking food. All these schizos who needs drugs, fad diets and insane fasting techniques are actually mental. Just eat less food.
That's how you know it's working.
meth wins again
why are SwoleShack anons trying to discourage fats from losing weight at any cost
it doesn't hurt SwoleShack people and just makes the general population slimmer
>at any cost
The cost was her life, anon. She's going to lose all the weight because she's decomposing.
She could have just eaten a little less than normal.
retards, the people taking these drugs WILL NEVER lose the weight naturally. you're arguing in favor of keeping more fat people around because they MIGHT die to a drug.
no matter what they will not willingly eat less, so there is zero harm in us letting them take these drugs. the only alternative is for us to let them stay fat forever.
yes they literally would rather potentially DIE than stop eating. their choice, its zero cost to us.
They would for sure lose weight if government stopped lying.
>They would for sure lose weight if government stopped lying.
retarded, what in gods name makes you think that even when confronted with the absolute truth, that fats would find willpower in their hearts to stop eating so much
these people look in the mirror every day and see the results plain to their eyes and do not change, a government statement would not change their mind.
Everyone was skinny in the past. Before the calorie psyop.
>Everyone was skinny in the past. Before the calorie psyop.
yeah, in the past. the western man of 1950 is not the same western man of 2020
let the fats take the drugs. it literally does nothing to hurt us, and makes it so we have to see less fat people.
>we did it we cured obesity!
>just like we cured covid
Is there anything pharma can't fix?
there is no similarity between the two, nobody is claiming to cure obesity, we are just treating the symptom (disgusting fat people everywhere)
would anyone argue that someone who takes this drug will not lose weight over time? and who cares about the side effects, we are not the losers who take it.
Yeah back when they smoked, snorted coke, and didn't spend all day indoors. You saved all these images yet can't do basic critical thinking for yourself.
foods were likely less calorie dense in the past. people were likely more active in the past.
People in the past ate butter. Fear of 'calorie dense' fat is modern.
who cares homosexual. worry about yourself. the population needs to shrink, not in weight, but in numbers
>the population needs to shrink, not in weight, but in numbers
lmao you NPC
do yourself first
>the population needs to shrink,
Maybe in Africa. The world needs more white people to keep everything running
>retards, the people taking these drugs WILL NEVER lose the weight naturally.
Bullshit, you don't know that. Sure, a majority of people won't ever do it, but a sizeable minority of once-fat people HAVE lost the weight and kept it off for good.
Now some of those people who otherwise could/would have lost the weight naturally are going to skip over that option and go straight for the shortcut method because people shill it as being great and they don't realize the shortcut is mortally dangerous and completely inferior to natural weight loss
Controlled depopulation is the solution
>their choice, its zero cost to us.
Only the most retarded people think this. It doesn't matter what country you're from, fat people raise the overall cost of healthcare. Universal health care? Where do you think your tax dollars are going? The fat people. US healthcare? All those government subsidies are again going to fat people, and again come from taxes.
You don't live in a bubble.
They would if we put them in cages and controlled calories
>the people taking these drugs WILL NEVER lose the weight naturally
code for
>I haven't tried anything and nothing is working, how could this be?!
I would trade the life of every fatty for one more slim or fit person
People are killing themselves with pharma injections when they could just quit carbs.
It's insane. It's like the covid mRNA jabs all over again. Unnecessary injections with terrible consequences.
Let em fucking rot. Mommy needs a house. (me)
LONDON
>is no more!
kek
The problem has always been eating too much and the solution is still don't eat too much
>Ozempic is potentially dangerous medication that could kill people, but it's worth taking because it does this one thing impossible without drugs (stop eating too much)
>tells his patients to eat 600 calorie diets
>fat-asses try to make him their anti-CICO hero
Keto brainrot is real and observable.
Are calories from carbs different from other calories?
Dr Now is constantly telling people "no carbs".
Processed foods which are rich in carbs tend to be calorie-dense and nutritionally vapid.
I'm sure that when this guy tells fatties to cut the sugar/carbs, he's talking about doritos and ice cream. Not fresh fruit and vegetables
Coca-Cola has a very low calorie density.
No it doesn't, a single 12oz can contains 140 empty calories. Drinking calories is always a bad idea when those calories come from added sugars and thus provide no nutritional value. Milk has similar caloric content but it provides nutrients in the form of protein, calcium, and vitamin D so it doesn't purely serve to make you fat like coca-cola does
>Milk has similar caloric content
Milk has 50% more calories, retard.
well he could have meant 1%.
>remove the part that makes milk calorie dense
>"Wow you see guys milk isn't calorie dense at all!!"
Sorry anon but anyone who drinks whole milk is retarded, it's more like a cream than a beverage
>my sugar water is real milk!!
You're an idiot.
I mean, human milk has an even higher sugar to fat ratio than 1%
>retarded whataboutism
Did you know that they have to add artificial vitamins into reduced fat and skim milk because you remove them when you process it to remove the milk fat.
>but muh heckin processed artificial milk!!!
Dumbass.
>retarded whataboutism
???
>But what about human milk?
Whataboutism. 85 IQ retard. Maybe you need to stop drinking artificial milk, it's damaging your brain.
If human milk composition is irrelevant to human nutrition I don't know what could possibly be on topic, so you're either disingenuous or profoundly retarded - I assume the former
That's not the topic. You pulled a whataboutism because you're a homosexual and got btfo.
I guess it's the latter
have a nice day.
>just as much protein, vitamin and nutritional content with fewer calories and doesn't have the consistency of a thick cream
Yeah skim milk is just better in every single way, sorry
No skim milk is for dick sucking homosexuals. The 60 extra calories per 8oz you save vs drinking whole milk is not worth the massive loss in taste. If you can't spare the extra calories or you're afraid of fat you need to rethink your diet
lol dumbass, "but it tastes better!" is literally the mantra of fatties everywhere as they justify their shitty diets.
>he doesn't like water
They have to add artificial vitamins to skim milk dumbass, they get removed when they remove the milk fat.
They add artificial vitamins to whole milk as well, it's required by law
FACT: only fatties drink skim milk
>drinking anything but whole milk
I don't understand how anyone can willingly drink skim or 2% milk. That shit doesn't even taste like milk, it's just cloudy water. I grew up drinking that garbage and I won't ever go back. Hell, I even pay extra for the raw milk with cream on top now.
Is not weak*
Fixed it for ya
>it doesn't hurt SwoleShack people
Yes it does, I want my rarity.
Billions must eat pie.
This, but unironically. How am I supposed to get a wife if everyone is ripped too?
>why are SwoleShack anons trying to discourage fats from losing weight at any cost
There should be a clear visible distinction between high a low time preference individuals. I say this as an overweight person.
1.) this place is about HEALTH. taking drugs that damage you body because you dont have the willpower to form good habits is not health
2.) my insurance premiums pay for these fatties who can't cultivate willpower
I would LOVE if people were all healthy and fit. But this ain't it, chief.
>muh preemyumz
Retard, insurance companies pay nowhere near the label cost for covered drugs.
Fatties are only using the drugs, they aren't changing their lifestyles.
I encourage fat women to lose weight using drugs. Fat men can stay fat
I find it horrifying that Americans are poisoned by the food industry putting seed oils in food, and the answer to this is to buy a drug from a different American industry
Ozempic is danish bruh
It doesn't teach your discipline.
It doesn't make you change your eating habits, or seek help for healing the mental trauma causing you to over eat.
There are already plenty of adverse effects coming into light. One of them is that you need to stay on the drug for the rest of your life, as your body stops producing the hormone the drugs imitates.
It's good for investors, though. For now.
You can lose weight at 0 cost already, just eat less.
Why can't they do CICO and fasting like any normal human?
there are people who seriously think being fit is a competition and want other people to fail. These are the same people that think using steroids outside of competitive sports is somehow cheating
>nooo you can't make fun of people that hop on a life-time subscription of a drug rather than putting the fork down
I am against people doing shit the lazy way because they won't keep it off, but I'd bet money this isn't the drugs fault. Its a peptide, its not crazy shit.
It's for sure ozempic which killed her. She died from a gastrointestinal disease it is known to cause.
Was it blockage of the bowel or stomach paralysis
The drug slows gastric emptying. The disorder itself, which you can be left with because of taking the drug, carries an estimated mortality rate of 33% at 5 years
I dated a stupid fucking cow that already had digestive issues and wanted to get on this.
FYI ketoschizo is a 350 pound British agoraphobe who refuses to leave his home. He got outed in the last thread.
60 percent of the replies in this thread are him.
lets see the receipts
How many bodybuilders/athletes in peak physical shape follow keto? I would bet that it's fewer than 5%
ive heard many more use it but intermittently like for a short period of time while cutting
Ok.
>fatties eat carbs therefore carbs = bad
Fatties eat absolutely everything under the sun.
Carbs are good for fueling workouts. I doubt any of you ketofags even lift because you think your meme diet is magically going to make you ripped without any actual effort
Many top pro bodybuilders cut carbs to get shredded.
They also count calories to ensure that they remain in a deficit
Why would athletes at their peak be worrying about losing fat? I hear retarded ketoschizo arguments on here all of the time, but that takes the cake.
If you actually believe the guy on the left is sedentary then you're retarded
So you're approaching it from the standpoint of a lifelong obese lard trying to cut down to a normal weight for the first time in your life, and not from that of an already relatively fit person trying to reach peak physical condition
I reiterate, people who actually reach peak physical shape (NOT just a normalfag skinny/skinnyfat build) tend not to follow keto
>people who actually reach peak physical shape
post physique
The pure dishonest nature of this pic is enough of a reason to not trust its claims
What's dishonest about it?
>cherry picking a fat guy and branding him as the anthitesis.
>unlimited carbs
>posting a single picture of someone who, by definition of how muscle is created, is not sedentary and caliming it is
>the chad vs virgin meme format
>0 actual arguments, links etc.
>the filename indicating its a part of a spam collection
Even a schizo info dump is much more trustworthy than this
It's not cherry picking. It's Anon vs. Anon.
Everyone was skinny in the past. It has nothing to do with American lifestyle and HFCS.
>Its retard vs retard
Wtf i love keto now
>/FAT/ Weightloss General
>happy new year, /fat/. heres to another 100 pounds lost in this coming year. 150 down already, but still so much to go.
At least use examples of people not trying to lose weight.
>/fat/ - Fat Loss General
Of course it's a bullshit comparison.
You are confused.
These are image comparisons showing people from the /fat/ thread. Different diets yield different results.
With that face, being slim is indeed not worth it.
She’s a middle aged woman and you’re calling her ugly? Don’t you think you’re being mean to a dead mother?
Turns out we can't just turn off our hunger signals without huge consequences.
I genuinely don't understand how people can't lose weight. I'm down 8kg in 7 or 8 weeks by occasionally skipping lunch, not eating biscuits and jelly snakes and switching to skim milk. Admittedly i wasnt fat in the first place, I'm just cutting for a weight division.
The calorie psyop made everyone fat and incapable of weight loss.
>calorie psyop
If you eat less calories than maintenance. You will lose weight. That isn't a psyop you retard.
You fell for the psyop.
>constantly eat at a surplus
>surprised when weight increases over time
>eat more calories
>lose more weight
Oh no calorie bros how is this possible?
>Both experimental diets were designed to be hypoenergetic (-500 kcal/day)
So they were eating at a calorie deficit. CICO wins again idiot.
Isocaloric, yet one is superior? How do you explain that without debunking the whole anti-keto mantra?(or sounding mad?)
You lose more water weight on Keto. It's why you idiots fall in love with it so much. If they did the study for a month or two longer the weight loss would even out.
the study said they lost more fat mass on a low-carb diet, not just total body weight.
nagger IQ
The low-carb men lost the most lean mass.
water
I wonder if this takes into account that very low carb kills your glycogen - meaning your muscles will recover that mass quickly. Seems like this may suggest a high amount of muscle loss, when that isn't really the case.
>very low carb kills your glycogen - meaning your muscles will recover that mass quickly
No it doesn't señor retard
yes it does, less energy is stored as sugar in the muscles, causing them to loose their water, youd know this if youve ever dieted, you lose a large amount of weight right at the start, thats water!
This isn't because carbs make you fat, its because low fat diets suck for vitamins and minerals. Shit like carnivore works because meat is nutritionally dense. That's the important part. Lifting on no sugar sucks once you start getting older if you still do high intensity.
Carbs are no problem if you use them, and gluconeogenesis is just not very efficient. I couldn't keep up with lifting on keto, even as a noob, and I was inadvertently eating 4000-6000 calories a day, which is just atrocious.
Lifting on zerocarb is fine. You're just an addict.
Baker takes it easy though. Who the fuck does dl in sets of 15.
omg he did ... ahh .... ohhhh... 20 singles trap bar rack pulls, huwhy? all he had to do is stand on a step (because of retard setup but ok) and do not drop the bar, he would get 3 reps maybe 4
old people should avoid retard gimmicks in gym
>he would get 3 reps maybe 4
did i mention that u don't stand up fully also? that is if u want to achieve time under tension, if ya just want to "lift heavy" on the other hand - go ahead and do your many-o-singles xD
>who the fuck doesn't stand fully up while training deadlifts?
eddie hall for example, anything else bot?
2200 is undereating, people just eat garbage is the problem.
>2200 is undereating
Ask me how I know you're a total fatfuck.
Good question since I'm 145 lbs. I was 300 in the past though.
Lmao. 2200 is a bulk for you, little guy.
If it were I wouldn't have said it, since I actually know wth I'm talking about.
Lol. Your BMR is like 1,600.
Let he who is without DYEL cast the first stone.
Post fizeek and stats or your BMR is 1000.
My BMR is 1000. I'm actually a 4'5" 80lb vietnamese.
My condolences.
I'm an early intermediate lifter currently just trying to get out of a recovery hole and heal an injury, so I'm on sedentary maintenance calories. 2160. Just for sitting around doing nothing, walking about as you normally do. If I train, my maintenance is nearly 2800, and it was higher before I got injured since I can't train my legs at the moment, so I lost a lot of lean mass there.
If you're in a surplus on 2200 you're either not lifting or you're an absolute twig. A chubby but strong guy actually making gains is way cooler than a skinny twink who is obsessed with maintaining his tiny and lean physique forever. Learn to plan for the future.
>w-well it's undereating if you're lifting and doing cardio!!
Epic bro. Next you're gonna tell me 6k calories is actually under eating because Michael Phelps was eating 8k calories a day while swimming for hours a day.
Most people, which is what that chart is referencing, are sedentary.
Gee, I didn't know I was going to recieve such high praise! Cardio? Never. B) Well sure I do some, but I'm not some star athlete. I plan on being one in the future, but I'm just a guy. We're not talking about cutting here, and people who are undermuscled should be bulking when they're not too fatty. Even so, you should lift when you cut, unless you wanna lose tons of gains while losing way less fat. So someone my weight (low 180s) at 30% bodyfat instead would be eating around 2500 calories for maintenance while training, so likely 1700-2000 calories WHILE CUTTING. Imagine that.
You shouldn't go by certain unhealthy standards just because they're the norm. What's the norm is killing people or otherwise depreciating the quality of their lives. It's good to get a lot of nutrients in, to burn more and take in more.
>blah blah blah
You missed my point completely and typed a bunch of garbage. Follow the conversation.
The chart references the average person, who is supposedly eating 2200 calories. The average person is sedentary. Screeching that 2200 is undereating is retarded.
>b-but what about exercise
They aren't exercising.
>but they should!
That's a different conversation you retard.
Hey, don't call me a retard as if that's somehow a bad thing!
This is my convo and I'll retard it however I want!
2200 is undereating for a 5'10 180 male even on bullshit normie calculators.
No it's not. Also 180lbs at 5' 10" is a BMI of 25.8, which is overweight. A sedentary, low body fat male at 5' 10" won't weigh 180lbs.
Were talking about average americans. If you have a job you'll be in light activity.
Average Americans are sedentary.
Lmao if you really think your average American is only eating 2200 calories per day. Don't know where you pulled those number from but they are not even close to being accurate.
The NHANES survey is widely known to be inaccurate, but USDA data of per capita food availability paints a similar picture; calorie consumption leveled off 10 years ago, while obesity kept right on rising.
That's horseshit. If you believe it then you're a retard. naggers can't even into Secret Eaters anymore.
>BMR drops because your calories went down but your insulin stayed up
>Don't lose weight, do feel like shit tho
oops
Lmao. Complete psyslop.
>don’t eat an apple
>have 3 teaspoons of sugar instead!
well weight loss isn't as simple as diet and exercise. Not trying to defend fatties, but its not a simple process. It takes a long time and there's other factors other than CICO.
http://niceme.me/
go back
>skim milk
HI
Ozempic has really bad side effects and makes your face look shit after taking it. Normies will literally do anything to lose weight other than exercise and eat healthily (or just reduce their goyslop intake at least)
It makes food rot in your stomach.
>pharma cattle getting their Darwin award
many such cases
what research did he do? lmao. When we were first getting it shoved down our throats I looked up mRNA studies using animals and they all died.
>63
He lived a full life, some people are just not meant to live longer.
My friend's grandfather died from a heart attack two months into his retirement.
Zoe Harcombe is a keto/low-carb loon.
Loon? It works.
>mum
didn't read yuropoor
If you need to use Ozempic, you're probably not healthy in the first place.
>dies
>somehow revealed it was ozempic, even though medical history should be secret
>shown she was taking 2 different GLP-1 Drugs at the same time
>supposedly started to spit out "brown" stuff from her mouth
>no reputable sources
yeah just another schizo thread.
yeah, I'm gonna be safe to assume it wasn't the peptide drug and probably a narcotic overdose.
ah, the gold ol' blame shifting. The responsibility, never lies on a fatso
How many covid pseudovaccines did you get?
how much do you weight today?
I don't weigh myself.
>yeah just another schizo thread.
gee, you fucking think? SwoleShack is literally the worst place to get medical advice outside of the trashy alley in your neighborhood.
This is funny because the traditional Kuwaiti diet which most people eat is like 80% vegetable oil, but some American fast food joints at an American military base get blamed for the entire country being obese
they should tweak the tourism features in Civilization so that you can make other civs retarded and more dependent on you by showering them with fast food and drugs
Civ really would benefit from having more ways to wage indirect warfare. Having a population health mechanic that affects military unit effectiveness and can be attacked through Tourism, expanding the effects of spreading Religion, being able to debase someone's currency and end a golden age prematuely like the US did to Japan. All without even breaking alliances.
Don't care. Still taking Mounjaro. Still down 100lbs effortlessly in 7 months. Zero side effects after 1st month (a bit of nausea for a few hours after injection)
Seethe.
I never kinda get why would you use. Ozempig oink oink fatties grilling some pork barbeque, especially brisket homosexual I will slit their fatty wrists and squat some massive PR. Today baby.
>Highly shilled big pharmaslop is actually bad for you
>I'm supposed to be surprised
>Well...I'm not
I'm fairly well off. I have about 6 figures liquid in my bank as well as 6 figures in assets not including land. If my future wife ever gets fat, I will personally fund and supply her with all the ozempic in the world
Losing weight is so easy nigga, starve yourself
I could literally trick the schizo retards here into drinking urine if I just said the israelite medical company doctors that Biden appointed with the world bank doesn't want you to know
>thinking every homosexual here is on board with your schizo posting.
How many shots
>Didn't take new designer weightloss drugs for lazy, undisciplined people
>Didn't let excess calories enter my mouth
>Lost 45kg in a year and a half
It was simply that easy ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Fork put downs are an unstoppable exercise.
And cutting (most) carbs, and all seed oils. I was basically just using this list to make my meals with all my fats coming from meat, tallow or butter, and it worked fantastically. Didn't even have to bother with counting calories, as I would feel full and satiated before it became an issue.
I don't care about your homosex diet, good job on losing weight.
But I really want to talk about the benefits of nutbutter ;_;
Based. Dietdoctor is a great website. Low-carb is best.
i can lose 2 pounds a fat a day on t3+clen
wtf do i need ozempig for
u sure showed the israelites with ur pajeet bathtub blend.
Good
One down
Infinity to go
Another diabeastie removed from the land of the living.
Man this really is the (final) solution to obesity.
Tirzepatide had been a great tool for cutting but sourcing it forces you to encounter fat old people who cant do math or take zero responsibility for their being fat.
Oh and most of them are facebook users so they have zero care about deanonymizing themselves. Half the discussions start with
>DavidVoight76: Hey how do I buy bitcoin to order Tirzepatide from [email protected] with. Also I bought this 10mg vial domestically from scamlabs and reconstituted with 1ml of bac water. How much do I need to inject for a 5mg dose? Thanks, Dave
>When I nut and she keeps sucking
Probably just because they were fat and fat people die. It's like saying "obese pig woman dies of stroke after starting diet"
She probably died from global warming or winter vagina or something.
We can say for sure she didn't die due to pharmaceuticals.
My mom died of cancer in 1999 and my autistic brother still thinks the doctor killed her. If she died in the last 3 years he would blame a vaccine too.
he is probably right, medical malpractice is one of the leading causes of death.
number 3 cause of death
If you take drugs to lose weight instead of watching what you eat and exercising you deserve to die.
>get slim or die tryin'
fewer fatsos either way, so it's all good.
Would be pretty sad if it was your family memeber.
Nobody in my family is stupid enough to buy a drug just to not stuff their faces all day. Maybe some very distant relative in the US would be stupid enough.
>women dies after taking new drug to lose weight
>it's the drug's fault
>thousands die after taking new untested vaccine
>they didn't die from that!!!!
You don't think those are two different groups of people?
Ket-ack
Keto is worse than the vaccines.
Why do leftists lie so much, bros?
very surreal
Motherfucking guy trying to sound like the first part of the Pirates of the Carribean ride
Copemasters are naturally attracted to leftist ideology. They live in a fantasy world.
>religion
>Keto is worse than the vaccines
Any unbalanced diet is unhealthy, and keto is the stupidest of them all.
>died after
did she get hit by a bus?
why wont they say 'died from'? is it cause they're intentionally being misleading without lying and know they can't say died from.
you didn't read it said she died from gastro related issues schizo retard
Don't want to get sued by big pharma.
Being real with you, if it's got good five year weight loss numbers, then having some deaths is a worthwhile tradeoff.
Carbs make you eat more (you will get fat).
Fat/protein satiates you (you will get lean).
Easy as.
Fatsos deserve it
>Kazlauskas
LITHUANIA MENTIONED
LITHUANIA MENTIONED
LITHUANIA MENTIONED
LITHUANIA MENTIONED
LITHUANIA MENTIONED
>dying to an expensive drug because you can't put the fork down
they should have called it Darwinin or something
Good news! The glp1 thats leagues better than ozempic just got approved for addressing weight loss. Now you'll have Zepiggies too!
>literally kills fatties
The ultimate any fat drug, I don't see the issue.
>make your population fat and gaslight them into thinking it's genetics and they can't solve it naturally
>make a drug that helps get rid of fat
>Lots of fatties take it with no regards for possible side effects
America also has some of the highest insulin prices in the world. They made their population fat and unhealthy and profit so much off of it
So I didn't notice it said Australian but my point still stands kek
It also says mum instead of mom. However, if you're not buying the Novo Nordisk stock and stock of insulin manufacturers, you're leaving money on the table.
Can't be overweight if you're dead
blackmanthinking.jpeg
>weight loss drug
that site needs to be taken down. it’s not for weight loss as that’s just a side effect, it’s for diabetes. people are fucking taking diabetes drugs without having diabetes and then act surprised when something bad happens.
Well they just approved mounjaro for weight loss and not just diabetes, see
God fucking damn it I just bought stock in $NOVO. Is it too much to try and profiteer from mass obesity ONCE?
fat people will do ANYTHING to lose weight instead of just eating less
>I...I just CAN NOT stuff my face like a pig without Dr. Rosenthal's medicine
honestly some people deserve to be goyim