A colleague argued that weight loss is a privilege in society because:
(i) poor people can't afford healthy food.
(ii) even if they could, they don't have the time to cook because of how much they work
(iii) fast food is so cheap and easy to get that it's only logical for them to survive on it
(iv) they don't have the time/money to exercise
What do we think about this?
answer to all three is: eat less you fat shit.
you can loose weight on garbage goyslop. or just fast since it's the cheapest option ever
OP is a gay but if you did this you will suffer lack of micro nutrients, not that being a fat piece of shit is any better but still
They would suffer from lack of micro nutrients in either case, but at least they wouldn't be fat
The point is that they are eating shitty fast food and then making the argument that they can't afford healthier food. They could just eat less shitty food, which would save them money and help them lose weight. They're just dumb.
Imagine still not getting this simple concept.
BEING WEALTHY MAKES IT A LOT EASIER.
IT DOESN'T MEAN WEALTHY PEOPLE DON'T GET FAT.
IT DOESN'T MEAN POOR PEOPLE HAVE TO GET FAT.
IT MEANS HAVING MONEY MAKES IT WAY, WAY, WAY EASIER TO BE HEALTHY.
Understand now?
That's not what the word privilege means.
In every woke ass way the word is applied, it's an insurmountable advantage. Something inherent to the characteristic.
It's harder, but not a privilege. No one is arguing that. You're trying to claim it's an inevitable result to be fat when you're not rich.
You're fat and you could do better but won't.
I'm not fat at all but I do feel the pinch when trying to eat healthy, especially with current inflation.
Supposedly, being white is a privilege, being male is a privilege, those things are not "insumountable advantages" at all. In today's world they're clear disadvantages.
It's an odd way to apply the word "privilege" because normally privilege would be applied to the condition the person is in. You would call the being wealthy a privilege and easier weight loss would be an advantage of that privilege, not the privilege itself. Maybe that's the problem people have with using the term here. But on the other hand, to play devil's advocate, you could say going to university is a "privilege". So the phrase in OP can work, but I get that it sounds very clunky and suHispanicious to call it a privilege, I just want to make the point that it's vastly easier to lose weight when you have a lot of money.
Multivitamins are dirt cheap.
You can't lose weight by eating less or excercising, because obesity usn't from overeating, but malnutrition. Humans don't have subcutaneous fat. It's tissue affected by steatosis from malnutrition.
Proof 1, you can make mice fat by underfeeding them.
Lmao rat studies. Maybe this is evidence that fasting is better than consistent underfeeding
Proof 2: cattle got fatter when feeding practices declined.
At least you admit you’re a cow
Are you mentally handicapped, blind or just an idiot.
In this article they say, the grass got more energy dense and the cattle got less movement, thus raising caloric intake and lessen caloric expenditure.
Yes, I know, people have the need to bullshit around their delusions. How could that even fucking happen?
lmao, what a shit point. I lost 12 kilos as poorfag wagie by eating nothing but a junk food, but only once in a day. There's entire diets that revolving around eating goyslop and still losing weight. It's not optimal, but still very doable.
Stop excusing fatties for their spineless
Accidents (you began eating food that is sonewhat better), deluded people, otlr outright lies.
You can't burn the fat, because it isn't fat storage, the omentum is your fat storage, like the chimpanzee, people do not have body fat. It's steatosis, and can't ve cured by further starvation, but by MORE nutrition.
The Japanese avoid obesity through their high mercury intake. They are still diabetic as much as everyone, because diabetes is from the lack of lead.
>You can't eat less bro, it doesn't work
>Just try mercury
>The Japanese avoid obesity
Literally a third of Japanese men are overweight according to their own ministry of health
That's very low. They recently "succeeded" more in removing heavy metals from food, so it's getting worse of course
>That's very low.
It's within the margin of error of the global average but you can continue to believe bullshit
>It's within the margin of error of the global average
No it absolutely isn't, unless you count only those with BMIs between 25-30, which stays roughly the same everywhere as there is roughly the same number of normal people who become overweight, as the number of the overweight who become obese.
Stop replying to bait retards
no, hatred for people like this, real or imagined, fuels my weight loss journey. retards like this must flail so i can run.
You are wrong and both images you posted provide no relevant data. You are of below average intelligence and in a perfect society you would have been killed at birth and you parents sterilized for making a waste of recourses such as yourself.
I lost 30 lbs recovering from surgery. I could barely eat 500 cals a day because the opioids destroyed my apetite
I know this a joke post but some people actually believe this shit, lol
I'm serious.
>accidents, lies, and deluded people.
The insistence that it's from overeating is retarded.
>The insistence that it's from overeating is retarded.
vid related: (You)
i've lost 57lb fasting, stop spreading bullshit.
>You can't lose weight by eating less or excercising
Probably the most retarded thing I've ever read here.
they made a pepe of nikocado? nothing fuels my fasting like watching one of his disgusting displays of obesity.
you really cant though
not all calories are the same
your source of food affects how your body responds to it
eating calories and carbs with zero nutrition pumped food of hormones, seed oils, and addictives will keep you fat than if you ate whole foods loaded with micronutrients
stop repeating this simpleton shit
No, you won't stay fat, that's not how physics work. You will suffer from malnutrition, though.
>eating calories and carbs with zero nutrition pumped food of hormones, seed oils, and addictives will keep you fat than if you ate whole foods loaded with micronutrients
Not necessarily it's just basically impossible to sustain. Mechanistically makes no difference
You want to know what's healthier and cheaper than two cheeseburgers?
One cheeseburger
There's no good excuse.
He's right that it's vastly easier to lose weight if you're wealthy, to the point where it can become incredibly hard if you're poor and stressed.
Nobody is replying to your post because it's not worth it since it's so retarded. Just to let you aware of that, it is a shit post.
And nobody is replying to the posts that do put effort into explaining why that viewpoint is wrong. This point has been hashed over many many times on this board.
It's not a privilege. There's nothing that excludes it from those who make less money. Is it harder? Yes. Is it some magical privilege reserved only for the top 10% of society? No
Low quality OP deserves low quality responses.
t. retard
>(i) poor people can't afford healthy food.
They can afford to eat less.
>(ii) even if they could, they don't have the time to cook because of how much they work
They have time to eat less.
>(iii) fast food is so cheap and easy to get that it's only logical for them to survive on it
It's easy to eat less.
>(iv) they don't have the time/money to exercise
It doesn't cost anything to eat less.
Your colleague is an idiot. You can lose weight eating absolute crap. You can eat McDonald's every day, not exercise and lose weight. A Big Mac is like 550 calories, most people can eat three a day and not exceed their TDEE. Manlets and womanlets will have to naturally eat less.
Not eating is free.
The cost per meal of healthy food < cost per meal of fast food.
I.
They could get bulk rice, veggies, or protein that doesn't look like it's been through 5 blenders for less (by pound) than what junk food provides
II.
Cooking takes 5-15 minutes per meal if you don't mind combining simplest shit in the pantry every day
III.
Fast food is low-effort, but meal prep once a week is lower effort if you factor in travel times. Pic rel.
IV.
Jogging and bodyweight are free and take 30 minutes a day.
And yet buddhist monks aren't fat. Must be all that privilege of not being allowed to own stuff and having to go out begging for a handful of rice.
>(i) poor people can't afford healthy food.
they could if they weren't stupid
>(ii) even if they could, they don't have the time to cook because of how much they work
chance is they would make more money cooking for themselves than working that additional hour. also chance is they still find an hour to watch tv or whatever they do. if you're working fulltime there is a way to make do if you're frugal and smart about it.
>(iii) fast food is so cheap and easy to get that it's only logical for them to survive on it
yeah no
>(iv) they don't have the time/money to exercise
exercise doesn't matter for weight loss. also just walk, doesnt cost a dime
I ended up saving money living off frozen vegetables, rice and whatever kind if meat was on sale at the time. The time/labor argument is bullshit too sice you can get a rice cooker and George foreman grill dirt cheap and just nuke the veg. If you don't know how to properly season your food and budget for occasional treats you're a worthless retard.
Having an Instant Pot has been a life saver for me. I can prepare everything I want to eat in that thing in minutes. Not a necessary item, but I could do without a stove not my Instant Pot.
Fast food is fucking expensive compared to home cooked.
The bigger question is to think why your colleague is so fucked up in the head. World leftist framework:
>People can't be held responsible for the consequences of their actions
>Bad outcomes aren't their fault, therefore they don't deserve negative consequences for their actions
Therefore:
>Massive state intervention to confiscate wealth from the successful to improve the lives of others, even if those people are fucked because they deserve it
So that's what's at stake here and why you've got this bitch reasoning.
1. Less food costs less. It's not ideal but eating half the shit you eat HAS to be less.
2. Poor people don't work that much! That's why most poor people are poor. Loads are unemployment or underemployed. The image of some poor person laboring 80 hours in a mine and having nothing is a leftist meme from commieville. 34% of American families making less than $9000 a year watch over 5 hours of TV a day. Holy fuck imagine if they cooked while they watched TV.
3. Poor people spend around 10% of their food stamp money on soda. So right there you know they're not optimizing purchases for health. They could stop drinking soda, period and then have more money for better food. Or just not, and then lose weight.
4. Fast food is not truly optimized for calories. Poor people are stupid and so turn to fast food for entertainment because it's affordable enough to be fun and providing immediate gratification
99% of poors deserve to suffer because they are bad people and so were their ancestors.
>99% of poors deserve to suffer because they are bad people and so were their ancestors.
*because of their ancestors. Fucked up childhood riuns 3 generations towards. Hence nobody deserves anything.
Also most of the rich people are rich because of their ancestors too
Agreed. Only rich people can lose weight. Pic related.
Hey I live in poverty and lost 70lbs. I'm from a privileged country so I can afford to eat. If anything, being fat is more of a privilege.
>poor people can't afford healthy food.
buying the raw ingredients and preparing yourself is always cheaper.
>(ii) even if they could, they don't have the time to cook because of how much they work
I've cooked rice in the microwave it only takes 5 minutes
>fast food is so cheap and easy to get that it's only logical for them to survive on it
so I'm actually poor and fast food is a super luxury to me its usually a once or twice a month thing where I might splurge and get a pizza.
>they don't have the time/money to exercise
possibly only the excuse they have true if you're fat but homeless you should focus on not being homeless first
fasting
Your friend isnt entirely wrong. Poors also more likely to have their kids eat horrid school lunches. But so what if hes right? Those poor fatties still need to lose weight regardless of its relative difficulty. With an instapot its laughably easy to batch cook for 3+ days at a time. Oops instapot is a privelage cuz its 60-80 usd though
No, you're colleague has a mind virus that makes you see the world through a warped and idiotic lens of ideology and pathological denialism. There is nothing you can do to show her reality. Her mind is poisoned
>dont eat
it was my privilege
>(i) poor people can't afford healthy food.
thats not true. its just cheap food must be cooked and that requires diligence.
>(ii) even if they could, they don't have the time to cook because of how much they work
wrong.there are a gorillion 5 minute cheap recipes out there on youtube. 5 minute youtube search annihilates this argument
>(iii) fast food is so cheap and easy to get that it's only logical for them to survive on it
no. its just lazyness and nihilism
>(iv) they don't have the time/money to exercise
since the pandemic we have been in the biggest calisthenics craze like ever. its even fad. going for a walk dosnt cost a penny neither.
i feel stupid for writing all this because its so obvious.
I wish I lived somewhere that fast food is cheaper than healthy food. In the United States of America a triple cheeseburger meal at McDonald's is like $8 and is very few calories so, you need at least another triple cheeseburger. It won't be prime but for that price you can get a ribeye with mashed potatoes and steamed Broccoli.
>buy supermarket eggs and butcher liquidation meats
>have <$.50/lb 90lb flour stockpiled
>animal fat is practically free, render it in cast iron pot to make lard
>spend a weekend cooking, baking, filling my fridge and freezer to the brim while watching youtube/infowars
>tried out 48-72 rolling fasts for shits and giggles
My food expenses come out to around $30 a month and I make six figures.
I just moved cities, and my new grocery stores don't seem to like giving away fat 🙁
I have a few pounds of tallow left.
Do you save the cracklings? Any tips for what to do with those? I've just been mixing them in with rice
I just eat them all in one sitting
1) they can afford healthy food, they can't afford yuppie food. even if they didn't, they can afford less food
2) they can spend literal hours on the phone or in front of the TV, they can cook. even if they can't, they have the time to order less food
3) you can eat fast food and not be a fat fuck, just don't eat too much
4) they do, they just don't want to, there are pull up and dip bars in even the worst ghettos. even if they didn't, they don't need to exercise to lose weight
Your colleague is an anti-science idiot
I went to whataburger for dinner last night. A grilled chicken sandwich with mayo, med onion ring(the based choice), an unsweetened tea, and a tub of Hispanicy ketchup(gotta have based ketchup for based onion rings) was 730cals.
Even *if* all of OP's points were true, and this wasn't just one of the troll threads we've been having for years, the problem still lies with the customer's order and portions
aka cuz they're fat asses and eat like fat asses so no matter where they go or where their food comes from, as long as they are calling the shots on their diet, they will continue to gain weight. The only solutions to obesity are concentration camps and lobotomies
>The only solutions to obesity are concentration camps and lobotomies
The only solution is to put back heavy metals (Hg, Cd, Pb) and check for any possible other nutrients that we may not know of.
i hear this shit from fats online all the time, there's always some excuse or reason systemically oppressing them from putting the fucking fork down that's just completely beyond their control. most grocery stores in my area have a discount section in the produce department practically overflowing with "ugly" produce for dirt cheap, they could buy 3 of these for less than the cost of one party bag of tostino's pizza rolls. but they won't, because none of them have walked into the produce section for years. i lost 57lb so far just fasting, and it didn't cost me anything more than the cost of a 2 liter pitcher and the salts for snake juice. there is no excuse.
He's a fucking idiot. I came from nothing. Rice, chicken, and beans is not really expensive. This is an excuse for disgusting people.
>Oh no! I'm a little bit hungry! Hunger is uncomfortable! I need to be as comfortable as possible at all times! I better eat these 3 big macs, 2 extra large fries, and an extra large diet coke(I can get free refills on it) before I die of discomfort!
Eat less and move more, fatties
Baby carrots cost less than cheetos.
I think your colleague is full of shit and actively seeking excuses to be fat and lazy.
>(i) poor people can't afford healthy food.
Only true if you're on a high meat, dairy, and protein diet. I live on 90% starch based carbs and they're dirt cheap.
>(ii) even if they could, they don't have the time to cook because of how much they work
This is only partly true. Having more free time allowed me to educate myself and learn how to save both time and money. I can cook an entire week's worth of food in minutes now. Yet I remember struggling in the past.
>(iii) fast food is so cheap and easy to get that it's only logical for them to survive on it
Fast food is neither cheap nor time saving to survive on. Takes less time and money to prepare your own.
>(iv) they don't have the time/money to exercise
Takes barely no time or money to exercise unless you want to. If you don't have fifteen minutes a day to exercise, then there's something seriously wrong with your time management.
In short, if a disabled idiot like me can do this, then everybody else can do it too. They simply make excuses.
No. Being poor sucks and they eat their feelings. I’ve been there. You can get a stack of chicken thighs for $10 and grill or bake them with $1 seasoning and you now have the main course for three dinners. Add in broccoli and carrots and maybe some fruit, $20 total for delicious meals to last the better part of the week. Compare that to $10 per meal minimum at mcdonald’s
The great thing about eating healthy is that you now have the energy and drive to prepare more healthy food. “Time to cook” is not an excuse. Instead of 30s in the microwave it’s 5m on the stove, 30m mostly unattended in the oven or on the grill. You have that time, there is no excuse. It simply takes a little willpower to get past the hurdle of feeling like unmotivated shit when you eat microwave dinners and takeout. But the ball rolls itself after you push.
kek at fat people thinking they are medieval tier peasants eating 1 piece of bread a day when they can go to mcdonalds and buy a whopper for 1 dollar thats 400 calories
>itt: people are cattle
fast food is over $10 a meal, I spend $50 on healthy food a week, fruit, fish, cheese, oats, potatoes, I barely cook anything.
I used to be fit to the point to have abs 1/2/2.5/3.5, at that time my parents used to bring me food while I was at school.
Now I'm poor and my abs are not visible (gained some body fat). Your friend is wrong, I have the time to cook and eat healthy food BUT due to stress, I tend to eat more calories. There is also time to exercise but currently, I don't have the energy to exercise (job construction).
It's something like you prefer to give up when you're living at the bottom of society.
I'm trying to fix my shit bros. WAGMI.
>poor people can't afford healthy food.
I'm poor, frozen veggies are extremely cheap. Also if you're losing weight you will buy less food and save money.
>even if they could, they don't have the time to cook because of how much they work
You don't eat as much. Also literally just eat meat and veggies. Microwave some fucking broccoli. Takes 4 minutes.
>fast food is so cheap and easy to get that it's only logical for them to survive on it
It's not cheap though. Every time I get it it costs 30 dollars. Are they just getting the dollar menu?
>they don't have the time/money to exercise
It's free and takes one hour to walk for a few miles every day. Literally all you need unless you're trying to get buff.
>T. Lost 60 pounds
>(i) poor people can't afford healthy food.
Bollocks.
>(ii) even if they could, they don't have the time to cook because of how much they work
Also bollocks and a cheap way of weasling out of the first point.
>(iii) fast food is so cheap and easy to get that it's only logical for them to survive on it
Also bollocks.
>(iv) they don't have the time/money to exercise
The same point as (ii) so also bollocks.
I'm guessing your colleague doesn't actually know any poor people. Most of them are poor because they make horrible life and financial decisions, and don't work as much as your colleague seems to think they do.
when i was poor and lived in the ghetto i got very fat becase
>nothing but goyslop and moronfood within 5 miles
>apartment was a shithole and miserable to cook in
>even when i did cook, small sink, no dishwasher, shit tools, whole place smelled because no ventialtion
>working exhausting job all the time and by the time i got home i had to get ready for work, no time to cooking
>cheap locals gyms are fucking awful and you never want to go back because theyre full of morons, morons, fatties, and sexual predators. literally morons would eat chips in the sauna and then leave their trash there. wetbacks would go in groups of 8 and hog an entire dumbbell rack
(i) poor people can't afford healthy food.
>kek no. I'm poor af, I work at a gas station and I afford eating healthy just fine, the people who make this excuse don't realize they're spending $20 a day on cigs and "diet" soda
(ii) even if they could, they don't have the time to cook because of how much they work
>if they actually worked a lot they wouldn't be poor, making money is only half the battle they also need to be able to resist spending it all. They have plenty of time to cook, the problem is it would cut into the time they spend watching TV or scrolling on their phone.
(iii) fast food is so cheap and easy to get that it's only logical for them to survive on it
>Yeah it's so cheap paying $10 per meal per person. No exaggerated, last time I looked at a fast food delivery menu that's the minimum it would've cost
(iv) they don't have the time/money to exercise
>see response to point ii
>Poor people are fat
Can't be that poor if they can afford food.
I skip meals all the time because I'm poor.
Fast food isn't cheap. It ends up being exponentially more money than a simple home cooked meal. What it is, is easy. And that appeals to lazy or just tired people.
Not all poor people are lazy, some genuinely work hard and are exhausted and just want something easy and don't know better because they haven't been taught life skills by their family or society. Others are just lazy, especially the ones who are on food stamps and benefits. They oftentimes have plenty of spare time, no exhausting job and just have to look after their kids. These people are responsible for their own predicament, however there is something to be said for "don't feed wild animals because it creates a dependent population". Leftists have created such a group in society now and it's a self perpetuating pit of misery. Rife with child abuse and creating dysfunctional adults shitting up schools, prisons and pretty much everything they come into contact with.
>1
Rice and beans are dirt cheap, hilariously so if you buy in bulk. Vegetables are dirt cheap. Chicken, pork, canned tuna, ground beef, all priced to move.
>2
Meal prep for an entire week takes me, at most, an hour, and considering I'm usually having a beer and listening to a podcast or something, I'm hardly being as efficient with my time as I could be.
>3
It really isn't, though. Even if I'm, say, only eating twice a day, two triple cheeseburgers from McDonalds both meal, that's about $14USD a day, skipping breakfast, so you figure $98/week... when my weekly grocery bill is, at most, $50... and I get to eat three square meals a day.
>4
30 minutes a day of walking/jogging/running and calisthenics isn't just effective, it's free.
---
What I'm saying, it's all cope, excuses, and bullshit. These people somehow find the time to play Call of Duty/Madden into the AM, binge whatever they've been told to care about on their streaming service(s) of choice, and religiously follow whatever sports teams they're vicariously living through, but you can't find 2.5-5 hours in the week to invest in your health? BULL. SHIT.
You know... there was a time I didn't have much, I didn't have a pot to piss in, or a window to throw it out of, but you know what I did? I decided to do something about it, I decided to stop blaming fortune, fate, and most importantly, everyone else for my own situation, and I resolved to become a better version of myself.
And you know what I learned? """Privilege""" has a funny way of coming to those who earn it.
So, in closing, nah brah, WEAKNESS DETECTED, OPINION REJECTED.
(i) Bullshit, healthy food is much cheaper than fast food. I can get half a kilogram of chicken breast, one head of broccoli or 5 kg of potatoes for the price of one Bigmac. Sure, if you compare fast food to "muh organic gmo free bio-food", the latter is going to be more expensive, but even the cheap veggies and raw meat that you can buy at any supermarket is much healthier than fastfood.
(ii) Statistically, people with higher incomes work significantly more hours per week than those with small incomes. As a young lawyer, I worked 60+ hours a week and still found time to prep meals and get some exercise done (by cycling to work and lifting weights in the evening).
(iii) see (i)
(iv) see (ii)
So next time you see your friend, call him out as the massive gay he is.
The only instance where this is true is if you're basically destitute and the country you live in is also destitute. Most other people are just using it as an excuse.
I buy way way less shit when I cut
I save more money
Retarded.
i) They can afford it, they choose not to buy it. Fast food is not cheaper than eating like a functional human. This myth really has to stop.
ii) Show me poors who work more than non-poors
iii) It is easy. That's why poors eat it. That's why they're fat and poor, not because of the fast food itself, but because they have poor people mindsets. They take low effort paths and don't delay gratification.
iv) Running and push ups is the cheapest exercise routine, and exercising is not the most effective way to lose weight, eating less is.
I think the problem is ignorance and laziness. Poverty in the west obviously has a large overlap with those issues.
That said, nobody who takes even a cursory glance at the rest of the world would think like this. Poor people are generally thin.
Nothing more than critical race theory and liberation theology applied to food and health.
Ask your colleague if they've ever ordered the apple slices instead of fries or an unsweetened tea instead of flavored cornsyrup
I've been having issues lately with constipation and bowel irregularity. My doctor recommended I try taking metamucil, a soluble fiber supplement. I went to the pharmacy and was surprised to see how much sugar is in it. It's practically a milkshake. The active ingredient is Psyllium husk fiber, and the pharmacy had a product which is just psyllium powder with no extra sugar or flavoring. Yet despite being only one ingredient and a store brand, it is MORE expensive than the metamucil which is Psyllium powder, sugar, flavoring, and food dye.
Why is it more expensive to buy the healthy alternative when that has less stuff in it?
What about beans, rice, and oatmeal? Those are still cheaper than fast food.
Just throw some meat in there and that is 90% of human existence after agriculture was invented.
Bonus: Start a garden. Potatoes, Cucumbers, Tomatoes, Lettuce
>Excuse
>Excuse
>Excuse
>Excuse
I have a hard time believing the time argument because everytime I go to a fast food joint aside from Chick-Fil-A, I end up spending more time getting fast food than it would take for me to fry some scrambled eggs and wash some cherry tomatoes. On average, I wait 10-15 minutes for "fast" food. And that's because I go at odd hours. During a lunch or dinner rush, I'm waiting close to 20 minutes if not longer between arriving at the restaurant and getting my food. I couldn't imagine how long fatty's orders take to make, probably 30-40 minutes.
Maybe its just where I live, but fastfood here is not at all fast. I'm not even a good cook, and I can slap together good food within 10 minutes tops.
If I'm really crunched for time like I was in college, I take a few hours on the weekend to batch cook for the whole coming week.
Who cares? Why are you so concerned about winning arguments with your (presumably fat) colleague?
>A colleague argued that weight loss is a privilege in society because:
not privilige per se but wealthy people definitely have more advanages to get in shape. poor people still can but way harder becouse of your aforementioned reasons
Poor people get SNAP EBT benefits for hundreds of dollars a month that they can use on ANY healthy food, they just choose not to, because poor people are usually lazy as fuck and want shit they can microwave, or, they pick up fast food. Poor people who get those benefits rarely work, and even those that do, rarely work more than any of the rest of us, so it's a shitty excuse.
As a landlord of a 15 unit apartment complex in a rural midwest town that's filled with low-income whites, I will safely say that poor people LOVE to spend every minute making excuses for WHY they can't seem to get anything done, yet, they're always around doing jack shit wasting time. If half of my tenants spent as much time utilizing the exceptional job market where they could be making $20/hour easy instead of finding excuses to NOT work, they wouldn't be nearly as poor, but there's also a very strong correlation between income and intelligence in 90% of cases. Poor people tend to be stupid, and for them, "getting one over" on someone above them is better than just doing right by themselves and their families. I've seen it firsthand for years, and the cycle never changes.
Also, fast food is no longer cheap, it costs about $8-10 to get a meal at most places now, whereas you could make some chicken, rice and vegetables for about half that and get FAR better nutrition. But, poor people also HATE having to educate themselves, so that's that. And the excuse about time/money is bullshit. Anyone can go for a walk/run. Anyone can do calisthenics. Anyone can go find a makeshift pull-up bar or go to a playground. Anyone can work on doing push-ups. Anyone can grab a rock and hold it to add resistance for squats, or lift rocks as a deadlift/row replacement. It's always excuses, and anyone who coddles these people is as fucking retarded as the poor people who can't get their fucking lives together.
Unironically this. Poor people are lazy and stupid. That’s a fact.
To have the ability to become overweight/obese it requires such access to food that it was only possible for nobility 200 years ago.
yes, of intelligence
>be hungry
>dont eat
>hunger goes away
>look good
Why can't fat people do this? Must be something in the water/vaccines
>be me
>buy food stamps from lazy fat poor people
>I get even cheaper healthy food
>they get fatter and their nails did
As a college university student, I lost 10kg while everyone else put on the fresher 5kg.
You want to know why? Cause I was poor and I starved.
1 meal a day of noodle soup, and then if I was still hungry at 7 I would eat at the dining hall.
People who complain about losing weight should just chop off their heads and drop 115kg
sounds like cope to me. rice, beans, frozen veg, canned protein are super cheap and tasty.
>(i) poor people can't afford healthy food.
if you can afford _too much_ food, you can afford to eat less of the same FUCKING thing, brainlet.