being on steroids isn't about being big, it's about being cut. natural lifters cannot be that big and that cut without years and years and years of effort
Next you will post a picture of a woman and next to it...a picture of her...WITHOUT MAKEUP! *gasp*
I guess age is part of it. Let me explain something to you as a 40 year old: Absolutely nobody, ever, used to look this way. If your body looked like this, you were famous because of it, or your body looked like that because you were famous to begin with.
NOBODY looked like this in the 90s. it's steroids and sarms. period.
That's achievable natty, also really good lighting. But as with every "natty or not" question, that doesn't preclude that someone could be taking steroids. You could have a morbidly obese walmartian on a rascal scoot and that still wouldn't rule out the possibility they're taking roids.
Assuming he started for a skinny/skinny fat baseline, he's roiding.
His arms aren't even that big, is his chest really that impressive?
>h-he's not that big
being on steroids isn't about being big, it's about being cut. natural lifters cannot be that big and that cut without years and years and years of effort
also, the vascularity at his size is a dead giveaway. your body does not naturally construct giant blood vessels at that size.
How long would it take natty to achieve this? (Minus de roid delts) assuming perfect rest/diet
most people can't ever achieve that naturally. it's genetically limited.
Those delts are 100% roided.
this one is from february 2021 he says after a pair of weeks only doing push ups, pull ups and squats
Wasnt 100% sure but if this is his before then it's 100% roids kek
bro needs to address that black mold issue in his bathroom
Natty. He's tiny. If you saw him with a shirt on he'd look like a starving 3rd worlder.
>broccoli hair
100% sarms goblin
Looks better than 95% gym goers
So either he is a 5%er gigachad
or 90%er roiderfag
dunno, too little mass so could be natty with very good genes.
Juicing without a doubt
>SwoleShack kids can't spot extremely obvious roiders, episode #46837
Next you will post a picture of a woman and next to it...a picture of her...WITHOUT MAKEUP! *gasp*
I guess age is part of it. Let me explain something to you as a 40 year old: Absolutely nobody, ever, used to look this way. If your body looked like this, you were famous because of it, or your body looked like that because you were famous to begin with.
NOBODY looked like this in the 90s. it's steroids and sarms. period.
Yeah nobody looked like that because you boomers were mid af frfr
yeah turn into a rectangle more bc you listened to mark rippetoe instead of guys who look like theyre made of bubbles
That's achievable natty, also really good lighting. But as with every "natty or not" question, that doesn't preclude that someone could be taking steroids. You could have a morbidly obese walmartian on a rascal scoot and that still wouldn't rule out the possibility they're taking roids.