>%BF = 3.020 + 131.637 [log(umbilicus circumference)] + {-100.299 [log(height)]}
Use inches because it's this is the US Navy's new equation that got closest to DEXA scans and they decided not to use because it made everyone fatter than they were allowed. >%BF = 47.016 + 87.567 [log(circumference value)] + {-74.901 [log(height)]}
Previous version (that calculators do for you) to cross reference. >https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/24711616.2019.1584547
article if you really wanna get more info.
>i dont know how accurate this is
Read his link, it says 3.68 SEE (Standard Error of the Estimate). Let's just assume 5% error.
For 11% that'd mean you're between 10.78 and 11.55% BF or something.
>For 11% that'd mean you're between 10.78 and 11.55% BF or something.
i can see my ribs but idk if its that low. i thought it couldnt get that low unless you had a lot of muscle but perhaps not
You can't. The only way to measure body fat 100% accurately is to cut out all the possible fat from your body and measure it with a scale. Non ideal since you'd be dead. The next best thing would be a DEXA scan, water displacement, bod pod. It's not something you can get measure precisely. Those cheap body fat measuring scales at the gym that use the impedence method are decent at tracking changes. I have the scale pic rel and it tracked my bf % from 22% to 17%.
I stopped worrying about exact numbers, just go off how you look. If you look fat then you are fat. Obsessing over numbers won't help if you still look like shit at 12% you are gonna have to keep cutting, your genetics for fat distribution means that those numbers can have a vastly different effect on your aesthetics compared to the next guy.
But if you have to have a number get calipers if youd like I can find the ones I bought they are like the best apparently for the price and backed by some natty bodybuilding federation.
"Wasting" 10 dollars on a pair of plastic calipers that do just fine to get a rough estimate is an infinitely better decision than buying a $350+ one when numbers mean nothing. A rough estimate is all you need you should be able to use a mirror after doing this stuff for almost any amount of time.
No, they're just a literal complete waste of time. You might as well just use some sticks and tape. Skinfolds are extremely precise formula and they are not something you can self teach in a mirror because you flat out can not even mark down the right body landmarks on your own.
you prob won't be accurate w/ calipers, they're an estimate in themselves. but if you get consistent with them you can tell changes in your bf% accurately.
you prob won't be accurate w/ calipers, they're an estimate in themselves. but if you get consistent with them you can tell changes in your bf% accurately.
thanks. maybe ill do calipers and navy formula every week and average them
>%BF = 3.020 + 131.637 [log(umbilicus circumference)] + {-100.299 [log(height)]}
Use inches because it's this is the US Navy's new equation that got closest to DEXA scans and they decided not to use because it made everyone fatter than they were allowed.
>%BF = 47.016 + 87.567 [log(circumference value)] + {-74.901 [log(height)]}
Previous version (that calculators do for you) to cross reference.
>https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/24711616.2019.1584547
article if you really wanna get more info.
>Just did this
>24.4%
I didn't even realise I was such a fatass. Time to cut starts now.
>22.5
holy fuck no wonder i dont have abs
i got 11 and i dont have abs either anon you probably dont have enough muscle
not that anon but do you have an adonis belt? i do but no abs whats my bf%?
i dont really have an adonis belt anon
3.02 + (131.637(log(28)) + (−100.299(log(66)) = 11% bodyfat
i dont know how accurate this is anon 😐
>i dont know how accurate this is
Read his link, it says 3.68 SEE (Standard Error of the Estimate). Let's just assume 5% error.
For 11% that'd mean you're between 10.78 and 11.55% BF or something.
>For 11% that'd mean you're between 10.78 and 11.55% BF or something.
i can see my ribs but idk if its that low. i thought it couldnt get that low unless you had a lot of muscle but perhaps not
>Use inches
>100.299 [log(height)] = my height in cm
You goof.
Also 14% for you data-mining homosexuals.
>22.8%
It's cuz I'm uhhhhh I'm uhh bulking uhh just leave me alone
You can't. The only way to measure body fat 100% accurately is to cut out all the possible fat from your body and measure it with a scale. Non ideal since you'd be dead. The next best thing would be a DEXA scan, water displacement, bod pod. It's not something you can get measure precisely. Those cheap body fat measuring scales at the gym that use the impedence method are decent at tracking changes. I have the scale pic rel and it tracked my bf % from 22% to 17%.
I stopped worrying about exact numbers, just go off how you look. If you look fat then you are fat. Obsessing over numbers won't help if you still look like shit at 12% you are gonna have to keep cutting, your genetics for fat distribution means that those numbers can have a vastly different effect on your aesthetics compared to the next guy.
But if you have to have a number get calipers if youd like I can find the ones I bought they are like the best apparently for the price and backed by some natty bodybuilding federation.
Unless you're getting Harpendon calipers and you've actually been trained in how to use them you're wasting your money.
"Wasting" 10 dollars on a pair of plastic calipers that do just fine to get a rough estimate is an infinitely better decision than buying a $350+ one when numbers mean nothing. A rough estimate is all you need you should be able to use a mirror after doing this stuff for almost any amount of time.
No, they're just a literal complete waste of time. You might as well just use some sticks and tape. Skinfolds are extremely precise formula and they are not something you can self teach in a mirror because you flat out can not even mark down the right body landmarks on your own.
is your symmetric strength dude greenish yellow? Then you are good
Bmi== body fat
The cheapest way is to buy calipers
The most accurate way is a dexa scan
You should only care about how you look/feel/how strong you are
All the egotistical insecure self-involved closet fags that think they can micromanage the human body are the pinnacle of the word "hubris"
Which is nore accurate calipers or navy calculator method
Probably calipers in the hands of someone who knows how to use them. Save your money.
you prob won't be accurate w/ calipers, they're an estimate in themselves. but if you get consistent with them you can tell changes in your bf% accurately.
thanks. maybe ill do calipers and navy formula every week and average them