>Ethical
So they arbitrarily decide that mammals and birds are more valuable life forms than bugs and plants, therefore eating them is unethical?
Why can't I decide that eating bugs is unethical
Also mass-scale agriculture is far from sustainable. It destroys the soil
Less noicicepors or something? Idk, it’s less clear that bugs feel pain. We know they can’t feel love tho
But unlike vertebrates bugs breed crazy fast with much fewer resources, plus they’re so dissimilar from us that barely any of the diseases they carry even affect us.
how is meat not sustainable?
law of diminishing returns
the amount of insect or plant protein needed to feed a grown man directly correlates with space.
eventually the space becomes the same amount as a cow.
>consumer buys more stuff >manufacturer must make more stuff to meet demand >increased demand raises prices as manufacturers must employ more staff to meet demand >lower unemployment = more money in economy = more consumption = more demand
This can be artificially devaluing the currency (supply/demand graph) thereby further accelerating the inflationary cycle. Generally, inflation also comes with increased wages to attract more employees. However, there has been little real wage growth plus currency devalution.
Bug protein is mostly tied up in chitin and is thus not as bioavailable as meat, it's riddled with parasites that can transfer to humans, when scaled to the protein needs of a grown human it takes the same amount of resources, it's lacking in nutrients compared to meat products, among a host of other bullshit
>Insects: complete protein
Indigestible >Ethical
Subjective, therefore irrelevant >Meat: not sustainable sustainable
I forgot how animal life on Earth has only existed for 6,000 years.
>Chitin is protein
These are the meatheads lecturing you about fitness.
>Insects: complete protein
Indigestible >Ethical
Subjective, therefore irrelevant >Meat: not sustainable sustainable
I forgot how animal life on Earth has only existed for 6,000 years.
Bug protein is 25% bioavailable
>Ethical
So they arbitrarily decide that mammals and birds are more valuable life forms than bugs and plants, therefore eating them is unethical?
Why can't I decide that eating bugs is unethical
Also mass-scale agriculture is far from sustainable. It destroys the soil
Less noicicepors or something? Idk, it’s less clear that bugs feel pain. We know they can’t feel love tho
But unlike vertebrates bugs breed crazy fast with much fewer resources, plus they’re so dissimilar from us that barely any of the diseases they carry even affect us.
Isn't there research coming out that chitin from insects is indigestible and is linked to cancers like glioblastomas
>We know they can’t feel love tho
lol no you don't, retard
>, it’s less clear that bugs feel pain.
Bugs absolutely feel pain. But the question is, do they suffer?
Try hunting your fuckin meat, you dumb gay
Lead by example, rabbi.
Sorry but bugs arent kosher.
crickets are kosher
how is meat not sustainable?
law of diminishing returns
the amount of insect or plant protein needed to feed a grown man directly correlates with space.
eventually the space becomes the same amount as a cow.
Supposedly cow farts are killing the planet or something.
It's just lefty gnomish retard logic. Just like how they think inflation is not inherently caused by printing money.
It isn't, it's caused by consumer spending. Of course, if the currency is devalued that will inherently increasing spending.
That doesn't make any sense so it must be wrong.
>consumer buys more stuff
>manufacturer must make more stuff to meet demand
>increased demand raises prices as manufacturers must employ more staff to meet demand
>lower unemployment = more money in economy = more consumption = more demand
This can be artificially devaluing the currency (supply/demand graph) thereby further accelerating the inflationary cycle. Generally, inflation also comes with increased wages to attract more employees. However, there has been little real wage growth plus currency devalution.
Bug protein is mostly tied up in chitin and is thus not as bioavailable as meat, it's riddled with parasites that can transfer to humans, when scaled to the protein needs of a grown human it takes the same amount of resources, it's lacking in nutrients compared to meat products, among a host of other bullshit
chitin lowers your cholesterol though
>cholesterol bad
enjoy your heart attack, diabetes, and stroke ketolard. I fucking hate you ketolards so much it's unreal
>this is the person defending bugs
post body ketolard
Ay, all the more eggs to eat for me. You keep believing your shilled 1950 research, while i eat all the eggs assboy
>Chitin is protein
These are the meatheads lecturing you about fitness.
I hope I live long enough to see the day when even insects are not good enough for us. I can't imagine the kind of hell they have in store.
>not good enough
I meant too good
>Insects: complete protein
Indigestible
>Ethical
Subjective, therefore irrelevant
>Meat: not sustainable sustainable
I forgot how animal life on Earth has only existed for 6,000 years.
The future will be lab meat.
Just a piece of tissue, no nervous system.
No brain, no soul... Just like you, virgin piece of shit
VERIFICATION NOT REQUIRED
>The future will be lab meat.
This, at some point it'll all just be constructed in massive vats and 3d printed into shape.
Klaus pls go
>killing bugs good, killing cows bad
lmao get out of here
nice, some of those crickets even come with pre-installed spaghetti
I vill not eat ze bugs
>Eating big animal bad
>Eating small animal good
Whoa... I'm glad some bugman "ethicist" shill cleared it up
Saying plant protein is not complete is pure cope
Meat eating is ethical as fuck.